146
Mak vetechi
U
‚VIaJeme? Izinolo) .noli
Boimo my e moqu quod evali I coių irtel vel
200 g 10 pisinali pe wale wott eld ruint .mide ni JI ..ost sme mu mod_nou de bellitat has rul,Jagpa mug and go vit. Tel. of abeo snilo to Torage are venetel eiH" ALBANIAN Tind „ve „missing trean to SİMMAJİTU T8) yɗ võiuteqreg ri
, STUN HAOSG)
and going. Ta on enoit lag. 1 una aval dowe yo bentevog ed of fue ald på mat ."comib s dit son ILMA (.309,riad.YE tusz? to meeuj
isoare Elol [i* 1 .A) writ to fred i prested
howtovon rei "oh ni İyung ha: gofod eu magna a`utri odynol
0
I hi
mit une viere. ob.......* -:egory privoliot eris
EJÍ PAS DRO.. meli
ynolod xray¤ a ound lacheno plenod ni raia-burgeű edi rozynu to profaù vi. ne baj
Portiynol y a mi, vĨ To nenil
end He imel,Ii. ...to to ended mind, all wild ni bed un
besiton su son de llix si
* Maqulevue 'ci) qau bortDEJJ^
signed at Peking on the 24th. October, 1860, whereby China ceded to Great Britain "all that part of the Kowloon peninsula lying south of the Kowloon Fort to the northern-most point of Stone-cutters Island, together with that island": for the boundaries laid down in the Letters Patent of 1843 included the whole area ceded by the Convention of 1860 and a great deal more besides. If, therefore, the Letters Patent of 1843 were authoritative as to the proper boundaries, there was no need for the lease of March, 1860, and its subsequent ratification by a Convention.
The archives of the Colonial Office or Foreign Office will presumably show why in the interval between signature of the Treaty of Nanking in August, 1842, and its ratification in June, 1843, Letters Patent dated April, 1843, added "dependencies" to the island of Hongkong, and why these "dependencies" and the boundaries set out in the Letters Patent were afterwards wholly ignored. The matter is an important one; and I, therefore, suggest that the attention of the Secretary of State be drawn to the dis- -crepancy and that he be asked if any light can be thrown upon the subject.
氰
(Sa.) C. Clementi.
11th. July, 1913.
Ja Jangla no IJ. «TIS
•
*
MI-A JUJUB
borit no eois it red w
e. To enil
30 d no utol nå hellier :) (ovi (en), od 0.3m
and no em: Ici lod-u. A ami robu oni di daw to...I
bobulosti oze anali iuxley, of BondṣUI_q3 * To elun
guide.
tes da
2008
avoliot (IJul. bazy (1) Jod sie ritton the no ♬ me bio Jack end no
+
Qulam inaq mood bï end svous alíin but to sybir silt
-100 Mio Ne a bar no qt. 94.32 913 bron vindt bad 1)
1 750
Buo mi Jemmalle pinsaio bur· bočnië (voin ni yno-
010 2
*
L
23 qatolo 4.8 1. nelzsbmuud and ve...I to noisuerbeu Đud
jonningoset Jon sow bad to justmatejjel ons ni
To book and gai dame te ni nävo noisos es 7 Mori Jhorse, a ei tost
moževnou odd ji boftisen Dua,Pod MOI BA
burgis
་་་