There is a casuel reference in me your papers to W. Lealand as a precedent the papers with the dft LP. show that the W. Lealand precedent was phowed to the rose M. 2. the bunchs of the colony were defined go by geopaphical degrees & outlying islands in thin those degrees
any
was annexed
"
Dependencies" & N.2.
In this off LP after the word It Kong it's dependencies occurs as a pencil noti "the mint the best pographical depiction that can
he pin Athong" otby one this pencil noth a red with insertion giving the geographical degrees.
It seems chess & me that the drefliman, rather unnitelligently folowing to W.2. percelent, & probably having not my poor mass & work from, took a good with to be on the safe side & put margin
"
m
"ti dependencies
This pricel
motion
que certam knowlize & were
without considering the spec ofthe word. to me took any notice of the busmeis,
T
bebisen
at the time is the contradiction-
to 2.8. the Tarty creased cometion.
It is possible, though I doubt it, that the
light on the matter
to it then some
Intuit a dff for conson
JR4/9/13.
143
Rus
6/9/13