and before the S. Wt. quis his decision on the appeal I think we snd
: Ark the for whether yr Ballin's statement for was made to the (tre; if so, what weight they attached bit; & if not, ruffert that her evidence be taken outh. Say hit to S.&t. is not fully satisfied
A
of the manner in which the
case has been conducted
si
(Personally I said the michined to direct a new
be
reaving with tyre Bullin as a witness & a combitent short hand wiiter)
5/2/3
& till Mr. Bullen (senior) in reply to
that her son's petition now been w! his now under the conson the
24475
S.rs.
R17/7/13.
{
£ ! Andrum
427
E
My own view is very much that of Mr. Robinson and
I think Mr. Bullin should be given the benefit of
the doubt. The Kaviers did not realize the serious-
ness of the charge they brought against him nor what
the consequences would be. Mr. Bullin may have behave?
indiscreetly on his first visit, and the mention of
the matter to the husband led to a more and more
serious construction being placed on his behaviour.
You will see that your dislike for the sweets
part of the story is well-founded.
骨
tr
!
I would not have a new trial, but tell the Gov.
to have Mrs. Bullin's story enquired into, and sav
that if it is substantiated Mr. B. may be re-in-
stated, and that in any case the S. of S. would be
inclined on the evidence comment on its unsatisfac-
tory record ) would be inclined to give Mr. B. the
benefit of the doubt.
And tell the Mother we are consulting Gov. fur-
ther on the Petition.
AVC
23 3
13
I am afraid the case is a ellor one. Frace the Evidence and his Bellmisstatement
Hot Bulini no doubt thought that Am Ravin
Ташие
an the Pavel was bring retamed by Havers terms as "Jeanne and that on the first occasion be Kissed her, &
& promisedher