any change in
The
tim which is briefly
system.
that British strips may carry
corle's ander
contract to British histon, hat not cooke's
for freign counties.
w. appear
thane mlooked the
d
For 7. May
more revient conffe & scent worth on this subject eg. Sp/28373/19 En/2018/0
in which milishi tho S.S. Wid down that must ascertain, before allowing Itting
Mong. me
a port & shipment, that "there
the and are
is a naconalle catanty that the exipants will receive proper hee himent after their avioal
the country to which they
are sent
You will in from Mo./5000/ 13 that to S. U. nfared to allow contact enigration & Sanion Thank the answer must be thout
: IM P. ft. sees no
sufficient.
nconsider the decision
JR276/13.
401876
Lord Green
Jaich
I han
ko
09
dessic to interpon with
#
emigration
6
conducted on
Netherlands India, which in
well established system
sapquands!
The inte
worked under proper
that paper show как рафи
To
they ass
they
for to Juntow + then "indentured"
Ave
that his statement.
Amisted comipants
verbal contract -
←
of poling applied to
excipants under a pposed to
undefined
emigrants, whose empation to other than British promenion was prohibited.
Sh 7.
emigrants
wathy uyire
Bet
Amited emigranti
Maccuracy
быти
On the anamphis
tag
Am
و
seffor
220
to indented
Masin
рама
4
hat
沃
is to indentured emigrants
exact
#
previous decisions.
oppen to me to
ん
Referenes
the position is
#from
ko
thomore,
eu com
make the
f
Concessim
7th
Leyanda
4
#
I take it that it isnt ofth
Sumatra,
Curention to do
76
as wards
dipperentiation would have odions
? A proposed
Samon
Russ
27/6/13
commquences.
It is possible that under existing conditions British
shipping is regarded as precluded from carrying
11
" assis-
!
ted emigrants to the Netherlands East Indies, but as
the arrangements for carrying them in Dutch vessels
are regarded as eminently satisfactory see Sir F.
Lugard, last par of 40187/09) there is no need for
altering things in this respect.
? as Mr. Robinson proposes.
alouce
MU 2.7.13 Ш
30. 6. 13
2.7.13
!
1!