212
I „omy of B00 ML 2 00:13 hainelo do on ban
lu ca sale oorooua ya ni jako cind suny lob bivou
w.d. i 10 Talonio Vicent" to 3 ngƏN 119 10A pekcij ore «fu adie „98ering view Thaco Incrudo to elum ulic
308
JULRA 3
on nia
I JAT
(AT)*
B: DA
101 91: WT MJ RONWOT1 :
#.
'a vi, nosu n di dyloun
J eni,Mai JouzD I
son iwt ja edup ei ho
RAVOSJER DİY
(1). That I restricted my enquiries into the working of
the new system of collection of revenue to question- -ing my own subordinates.
(ii). Tast I used forms which had been condemned by Mr.
Messer.
(iii). That I failed to put a certain order in writing,
which had admittedly been received verbally.
6.
On 16.6.11 I replied to these charges, entering
into further explanations which, to me, at least appear to be con-
-clusive.
VG to Ju
OVJA Kul:
OJ
i
3
3
80,16 evour Liw jo
-paḥivo nova (ne minuter To Jindre,yo po ban. I
Butogei bod to some lis¡Ï
-
C
zi e10d
<
LOI MEÐ RI- aneci to mulesinoo to acumiva erizuIones
10 00
018 Boin
3.3
on no 10
·
.noityoulooniu pegu bokau van muku me paduri que duo aimud Jon 01.11.0 to odunia kin ni hatand dol1901) UF
JKING OC ledquodja I,JI.I.II no 48 Butun adada analid badqeoDA and, JyounodɛEL, ADJ
OV-
-391 no gnofc0 43 privind 31 10 6330 ont un qli
au balloon donguun and no noitasim! 2.00 19.1 undi.d.I mo
Isroioù ond ju surely 987 1 Capt., i osvitra I necio cuo B', { ... duiqsper, nà Tu Luuka nodw、ilvi 、o... el ne ‚9.1110 I and work. Hens (auviving con bou I duum,ol.ii.ci to Ajinim
1. col. No cau.,anulosusigre pa mogu nizoliol (CBLU (Onde
am h.....Donka on esjra ; lui,15 se te un jud polystos neid ovali elbulle nou gelom Bubule 1 Tonin and daf
At th
*:00 20
(OTO” 20ƒÐUR von comit
(2)
7.
It seems to me that the real issue has been
obscured by side issues trougout. The facts of the case are
simple. On Saturday 22 October, 1910, the shroff was sent to pay
money into the bank, after I had personally found fault with him
for not having delivered certain bills, which he tuen had in his possession, for comparatively large sums owing by certain shipping firms. He paid the money into the bank, and returned to the office with the bank receipts for the same. It was then nearly 1
o'clock. I had told him to deliver the bills love referred to on
the Monday (24th.), but it would seem that he went out again then and instead of merely delivering the bills to the several firms,
in direct defiance of my orders, he proceeded to collect the suns
owing on account of the bills from the firms concerned, apparently
in cash, and tuen promptly decalped from the Colony. These shipping
firms had all been warned by me, both in writing and verbally,
against paying any suns at all to the shroff, and had signified
the ir acquiescence in the new arrangement, whereby they were to
pay all fees due by them to this Department by theque or Compra-
-dore Order to this office. Had they carried out that undertaking
no defalcations could have occurred.
8.
I submit that none of the actions or omissions
stated in the above charges could have contributed in any way to
the shroff's dis nonesty, and that no possible action of mine,
dictated by the information in my possession, could, under the
circumstances, have prevented the theft.
9.