th. category
No 39.
t. faints
costs, whether extraordinary expenses proundings for habeas corpus,
included in
ther
to b
looked
пра
of expenses
reciprocally
desp.
'exclosur
To H.D. arking for doin
Lanised in
<
A
Aan pin cad
Air
M
Rol
3/3
Sir,
C.0.
6557
24 FEB13)
327
GOVERNMENT HOUSE,
HONGKONG, 31st. January, 1913.
I have the honour to enquire whether there
exists any recognised practice generally applicable in the matter of the recovery from Foreign States of legal costs incurred in extradition proceedings.
2.
Some if not all of the Extradition Treaties
deal with the question of the expenses of extradition, and in some
all claims to reimbursement are mutually renounced. It would how- -ever appear to be doubtful whether, in the case of those Treaties
which provide for payment by the demanding State of expenses
incurred by the State applied to, the term expenses covers law costs in respect of the services of the Law Officers of the Crown.
3.
It is provided under Section 4 of Ordinance No. 35 of 1912 that this Goverment shall be entitled to charge reasonable fees for work done by the Crown Solicitor in extraditi- -on proceedings. In ordinary cases these fees would be of small amount, but in cases such as that of the extradition of Vicente
E/V ́Sotto, dealt with in my Despatch No. 25 of the 22nd. instant,
-}}
where a prolonged defence in the Hagistrate's Court is followed by Habeas Corpus proceedings, the taxed costs of the Law Officers would amount to a very considerable sum. I may mention that in the case of an application by this Government for the extradition from Manila of a man charged with murder the Philippine Authorities
THE RIGHT HONOURABLE
LEWIS HARCOURT, M.P.,
&C.,
&C..
&c...
bade