100%
22
261
རྡོ་
i
'10
i
19
ed intonivoo wrío. yiqque of TOMTO LA
as hu (Pool) glued en Ki .preidhoo sud ud Ov (.d .U) .com € (6001) (mudii .q vl
to Junlie sud „Rītodo?"
¿
:
*
̧«l/-a-do-X .v .c90-.qjjk ni
ne Jen oh yoʻ?* :biro ni JA 9296M
quero os I jo call Jun
TUN, HIJ Mogu viim oidJ I GRUDNI Mlev on avons beniston si
TUZ VAL
mum gluggino me di (1979701
moï Vilei, n8J HULU
Jire bloger 9LJ OS - TUJ 41
3. Que Silen und te molniqu
NO COLLunar, lo einweg av to yelbilav 'holla.. » Jrora mi novi, Idonivovu ni noijons and to Joeldo
Doud Inwoo (Impoidazəv grimi ka juu mun noqu əyra! 03 sen
I
BOJAUŽNAL .9.44 .*.* MË .b.d
Agilis... Te e mujori ma
univlovni as Ja9718 000$ @J MALTqen car va dong`anind
to bna noizagiseevni to erados 9.4 að yliaiðnetruje sud dan vid seline ai faid. best ¡dinta junit ». # #orobiya
grinesuotų bncose eilt esad 700,.70
¡daxil suo ni şaixosi saw date bong m
ན་
i Jan 29g núʊ ni eadu
kuna mama Iqypa od ai
Tood wĩ 90 bipole sup my dad on Ialois afgJni (ga
*** I Jou”
mino IV a mi muwe and wk veiv rødzed tad
nold phoniere về phys du ROJ: 9JUJAJR now geld
213 mwaun dok usil jadi and Tu nfumdarg mT BALL (900 I Do on! 200,003 ?*gif bed to obvod to Jitened - svi ba.euTT
ɔframni on mi ni ..l,byoriol qu mim, da ji zna,ybodamo ni
$
seongliv de paie. dom. i molto.3 mi u IUIQUES.
cognizable in a court in some part of His Majesty's dominion,
and, so far as the state of Victoria was concerned, an offence that should be tried and determined there. That is pertinent to the present extradition crime, which carmot be
heard, tried, or determined in Canada or Ontario but which
may be tried in the proper court of the United States upon and after his surrender. I think that Ex p. Besset, (1844)
6 Q.B. 481, 51 E.C.L. 481, is also an authority that the
statute of Charles is not applicable to extraterritorial
crimes the perpetrators of which have taken refuge in
England or her colonies, though the common-law writ of habeas
corpus may run in their favor.
"Indeed, the remedy by means of this process is given at a
certain stage expressly in section 12 of the Extradition Act
of Canada, R.S.C. 1886, c. 142, though it may doubtless run at any stage of the proceedings where illegal custody exists. "The opinion held by the Victoria judge was expressed in an
early case on the statute in Rex V. Mackintosh, (1720) 1 Stra. 308, in which a person comitted for treason done in Scotland was refused the benefit of the Habeas Corpus Act because the court could not try a crime committed in that country, and so
also bail was refused."
In re Harsha,
Ontario Divisional Court Feb. 23, 1906.
11 Ont. L. Rep. 457.
6 American and English Annotated Cases, p. 496.
This case seems to be so nearly on all fours with the Sotto case
as to be decisive.
In conclusion, I would say that the volumes containing the decisions above quoted (not the cases cited in the decisions) are in my possession here and are each and all at the disposal of the Colonial Government for the purposes of this case.
Respectfully submitted, (Sd.) THOMAS CARY WELCH,
(Dated Hongkong, December 26,1912)
Assistant Executive Secretary for the
Philippine Islands.
T