9
248
II 40 IC to Jon ou
Section 2, paragraph 2:
J
0 000 9860 190TA 3 NA INIT SE
է
Julbud, to jec w ni polvo.
ne y đua (vII mow!) . sbuet „
{
MIRI GU OVE Iwo m
20 J03 Busub 12.304.16
Inudb, 08 Dit 83 and A
1 10.04ODROʻL
* 3
to unvaivio and erineb De
FT J04
Jon
Din Licht
ND FOT JOB OF IL
BLONJELOL. 90 Aigor J. when
-OSUDU A At Mireia odru.
jous" : "1 : Jlin, in Yo stovïq
(.
ŞILABİL (H00 gnivon
rehongi.NO: BCTO
and no meita
Una poqu „Jon
Pod Jun 6 07
6 10%
Jon ni Yol unity ? ek¢ Bu ta
noini, my side p
* A
DE N
Jun ni Gud. en BuoitaY
2
Alan end
19
BALOI
VODULIŲ OJ
}
38 i.
sov,noid.usBoTq JLoup-
•\Bucony ow 00
wal ev od NG
W
CORSO C
adhe e cl. wely on one pinialq
nogu Jaenzu c000s ⠀ mʊ11 vecosdung Juit de 19ing ‚evii noitoen as
gan to poi. Î NA TO mi 913
1.6
ka Videi od ybaŭ .v gniensä i i
3 Bi ano tren Al
La nice tu poltgetrooðin blova of
bet nu bino a vi
.... 4G epe mort pub. ink 7 ng emen eind
,83 met on jqouro muun Tlowi niidi
eci bani, polie ! ionovon si
Go Do win miler ni padce (ient in it to tento kuns
Monk • BOLJ DIA
na 200 the 201
noiy noiement 940
OJ TOPTOG
and er i o.
VI ..
"A person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime".
This is supreme law and takes the place of treaty agreements. To- -gether with the statute defining the procedure (Sections 5278 et seq. Revised State.) it is the whole law of inter state extradition. But for
the fact that it covers every crime and is enforced in the state courts
it is similar to International extradition.
One Kurtz was arrested January 19, 1686, on & J. P. warrant as a fugitive from New York. On January 20th. writ of Habeas Corpus was
issued. On its return prisoner was remanded not to exceed ten days. On
the 26th. the same judge issued another rrit to which the sheriff return
-ed that prisoner was held by virtue of a warrant of the J.P. and
further returned that he was held by virtue of a warrant from the
Governor of Florida. The judge discharged prisoner. He was rearrested
January 29th. and another writ was issued. He was discharged because
the commitment was defective. On the 30th.. he was once more arrested
and another writ was issued. To this, sheriff returned, February 8,
that Kurtz was held by virtue of a warrant issued by the Governor of Florida dated February second commenting him to arrest and deliver prisoner to the agent of the State of New York. After hearing the judge remanded prisoner to be dealt with in accordance to Governor's warrant. From this order prisoner appealed.
The court, among other thing, says:
"Counsel also insists t.at the former discharges of Kurtz by the Judge below had the force and effect of res adjudicata and that he could not be arrested a second time for the
same charge.
"We have examined the numerous authorities submitted by
counsel as well as others referred to in the text-books, and while it seems that in those States where a judgment of a court in a habeas corpus proceeding discharging or remand-