238
.VOVI Todmobali ni suradni svall to drob and 10 niobit
on good agið honuna .8 .0 and etkot » MMW 810. 10%
Miti nota, ni due monių ride 1903-
‚terdi.
ojjol to noivibentre nisduo od agejs
İçium ond ni obe. eam noid wilege rus
J1 81991 – 98800 BÍTNG
old of nona deu vi jend bise
du da to ni vol ynoloù ein li ber ofcol dag noiðarsvini. Ja .G JU tgage on a DLUNG D 18,90 Levo? (bredvremmo I) IIVI to alebba ene „Í KONJ» BBW Teq yara Bid ;*ellumot oniqilif" and inflo gnomQL Nİ 02 2178.00 bm noiseïda.n .5.8 cum to Laiviro bre Jel.smoldar.
.nonieqili-tu ki na Ilow 83 ‚Å .8.0 ond ni b Jalconis mau evoD Doitifoq nind ncis lien doo,brødstolom I D JI
鲁
onisgilina sand pub BAY HOİDADİLng: Jmid odgoƐ qui mu od eum Teqiq „noja įkvidna zʼoddoli mul veicinoÚJ BÀ
and arts she jivk nam noi.ibmwre %^ noij wilqqs UnT
L
end of beif q: eď dod saunarisa tot odu of Deudi 1100 0160 80VIJELB -ciù ne Jivuyta odorodalo via mon suytul Baedni: a 201 d'uso e etqu/ to adds fiqh no wonwon, lavi, now missnsa ne ybodyco mort beID=
#છે #
bejab Iuano0-90iT nuoitemd entë ju noivandili nowe B TO
8 HLİZ MOJENT13 necu ringe sau ojcol Tamy sind lo redkevoli nas vi îu eşidib car end to polvibridno nili niedlo od niyw niqs to woiv .roijoubda
as ni miviņai muree Iost I mole OJ Ba (micsoup ont
•
od piirgis of 800/US. OTIo 2.0 Tozada pollyona yüzelinuri ait: telde. W of waedong loose on tund strivɛlga, end -:JÚNG» Ju Tel (UBAUT QFJ 613 SLUT
Anivan odoo? Tendous siunto.JANUD VISV eliber di sapeded Janit vlístral bloos To Divone angiob aneuart e no ouro batatouii naad ylmerIn .TO/JAW US sad to Joyceɔ ni sudbetoony raidrot nu ir bevsť tú
.A ti Jac milest sidadiol.wori ne ova. I esy-o90 vinrosal even toven pluma ev erod requyana. Iwuicilog elud pocinje don ball oddol .owd anel dou, one ¡ile ja noidibrisve cin 167 moldaviiqqe ka baa
.A d ni beroiched Jniog Jenih end of JTagoT AJİV you) Lino Biw boyTms ei noeney s ti wej nail ̧á ml
ond ovong do boliet noijoussuty and 11 bas being ni
.2
age of the abducted woman and in consequence the accused was dis-
-charged, it would not be possible for the prosecution, having remedied
the defect in its evidence, to prosecute the person again.
The English Habeas Corpus Act lays down that no person
who has been discharged from custody on a Habeas Corpus shall be had
up for the same offence.
Now if one applies the rule strictly in this case it is
extremely likely that the Supreme Court would on an application for a Habeas Corpus discharge Sotto from custody and in my opinion would probably say that these 2nd. Extradition proceedings ought never to have been allowed to continue.
Sotto was discharged before because it was held by the Supreme Court that the requisition for his extradition was made by the wrong U. S. Officer and secondly because the documents had been not properly authenticated. These defects in procedure have been remedied but supposing Sotto tekes out another Habeas Corpus he will argue that to arrest him again in connection with precisely the same matter is legally wrong. I admit that it is difficult to say positively that the rule of the non possibility of re-charging with the same offence an acquitted person is categorically applicable in the case of extra- -dition applications but I think it probably substantially is.
7.
With regard to the second point mentioned in 5 B. This is, of course, rather a delicate matter. It was referred to at some length in the Judgment of our Supreme Court on the hearing of the Habeas Corpus. The fact that for four years and more this man was not proceeded against and that application against him was only made after he began to publish his newspaper here lends colour to his sugestion that the real object of these proceedings is to ob- -tain his return to the Philippines more from a vindictive wish to punish him indirectly for his political virulence rather than for his abduction of the young woman.
8.
I have spoken about this case to ir. Alabaster who, will be remembered, appeared for the Crown on the Habeas Corpus
it
48 (noidommon 20
proceedings. He thinks, as I do, that taking a broad view of all the circumstances of this case it is doubtful if this Government should
Page 240Page 241