very probable, take this time.
Personally, I am inclined to think that it would be desirable to obtain such a decision (§3 which in form only permits the Posts to prosecute) as it might be found in some cases that the Cr. Solr. par. I consistently we might adopt procedure. In that case, MR.D's suggestion is to have the objection stated that it need not be acted upon.
: Reply (for Mr.Kisley's slip) that the 1st ft. thinks it better to retain the subsec but that there is nothing in the wording to prevent a dead letter, or that the S.JP. will presumably have no objection in spite of the desire of sec 1960 to the continuance for the present at any rate & the existing system.
You. I think so.
In §3(1) it might be said that the word "Successful" in subclause (b) Hour Tous me pass Rs Channel unsuccessfully?
As the section now stands, district A observer that their election qualifications were meant either dec Wot o eurolement under d. qualification.
"I don't know whether it might further be the state expense actual bunchal Wricite may either port there over until thus is intended radically to say. Also Banister Ch A !!" he appeared to make such meets au the aft sep. Consent of L in para. 3(2) f 86777. (making sti the for. vecena be for Ker public Sffices Con Me.s Reprn) leave it to the for. to Lucide info.
So far as this point in Concernos i afre writer no Robin As to the dust Dial generally. Krian Whether I do not Beutt but in its present well t deft officially. form it seems to me 12. Then to criticism ride that any bun to pranda night smel qualified to be opposed brown Wicites should also be qualified to be appointed insistant.
The first point made que 3 V despatch in fram t seems salir actoris mot hint for diffriquestion.
very probable, take this time
Personally I am inclined to think that the it at. be desiralk to utain sut see 2 (§3 which in form only permits the to. Pots to prosean to anter on it might be found in some cases that the Cr. Solv. par I conseniantly
we night adopt proscente, In that cax
MR.D's sofgertion ing have the onbrection a
Say
that it need not be acted
upon
: Reply (fa Mikisley's sip) that the 1. ft.
thinks it better to retain the subsee but that there is nothing in the wording to persunt a dead litter, or that the S. JP. will Umaining have no
objon in spite of the derf of see 1960 to the continuance for the present at any rate & the existing system.
ابو النشر في
You. I thank so
Ini Suntall it might to
eird Cast the wond
"Success full"
in abound. Hour
Tous me
pass
Rs Chann
unsuccessfully?
Al
B
S3(1)
the
a A The Min Forb
83
Losk
?ualifications were meant
As the sicken
wow Stand,
district
Aserver that
their
fection
clip cationi
5.237/11
either
dec
Wot
o
eurolement unden d.
qualification
"I dont now
et Mer
I might feather be
the it
at state expens actual bunchal
Wricite may
either port.
there over unt
thus
is intensed
adicall to
ay. Alon
Baniste
Ch
A
!!" he aphouted to
n
this
سنگا
Tomake such
meets au
the aft sep.
Consent of
L
العلماء اليد
in por
appointment.
point in para. 3.2) f
86777. (making sti the for. vecena be for
Ker
puthii Sffices
Con
Me.s
гатый
Repren
leave it to the for.
to
Lucide info
So far
this point in
Concemos i
afre
writer
no Robin
As to the dust Dial generally.
Krian
Whethe
*
Zyx
I do not Beutt bat in its present
well t
deft officially. form it seems & me
12.
Then to criticism
ride that.
that any
bun to pranda night smel qualified to be opponed brown Wicites should also be inclified to be appointed insistant
Casc
The first point made que
3 V
despatch
in fram
t
seems salir actoris mot hint!
for diffriquestion
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.