into the calculation - and that therefor I am within. Non finial total award should in this cas, be based in 25 years tas proposed
either tof
I can fe
(a
in his Bar Lak attached of 15 June) and not in
and therefor the total pension (apart
£27212/
29 years should be t 235 and not
A
(4) Although therefen although Saints under then und Rules I think & Coast might & pay ₤1.16.8 ter than here stater and Akery might to pray £16.10/mont here stated, I would not let to hellebrioz. than £ 128.6.8 frond
J
Lave mon
[ He is at present drawing combined, son through CA. £103.17.8 altogether, I think he must wait a little longer for the adgurbor
Extra amant
;away ? Discus the whole maller further at (5)
an awkward precedent The Conference than suggested, smine this awar
ald form of accepted would,
5.475710
See my marquial notes – I malay party
but it is clear that this is hoxe a cass
Cifne
In which
nu
Si Gaidhes
conference is murst importent.
Wait.
Catt
gration
with. Sh also b
M. Risley is awast
Vell
70
Mr Hami
な
me he only wishes
me
consider Ms Johnson's sufferten
of counting
One sean of
11⁄2 for the pemben
S.c.
Lenice
2
y
Rep. 17.9
thi
H.K.
purpose Pension
Manali
Johnson
proportion
thave spoken to Mr.
that
& he
Vell
The did not advance.
this forpomet
legal one,
they
A
but merely day way of an
equitable argument.
He das
not claim
and legal foundation
ст.
7/2
for it
Spans to oft with pest
raluchame, and
bermen I feel that
Bout.
it is
C
in Glamber
Please look at the Aftrencayed. Henght to not agree with Mr Johnson's ingenions suggestions for overridug the law I agree with his conclusion dl (4) alore & I am
unt afraid of predat. It is for Lander & Keefe a deniz mane (to the Tessy till as)
dy out Mis passin
Cast: 30 Win!
h
Griffin emind?
hardship
650
but his pension and remain
unsettled for
wtirement.
Mr Griffin
our 10 months apps his
Whey?
Sit too soon to remind Wong :
ho. Kamnik 148 4/3/13.ch
Ruf
6m march 4/1903
0.