27200).
merly Were Hurst
JIN.
27/eet
478
Sir H. de Saumarez's notes on the
Hong Kong Companies Ordinances, 1911.
u
ce for the prespion of the awaiting out! went nest accontinere," the one.
Section 1 (3).
Subs (3) ought to be repealed. It is most un-
desirable that the Courts in Hongkong or Shanghai
should make orders which they cannot enforce because
the person against whom they are made is in the juris-
diction of the other Court, the application should be
made direct to the Court having jurisdiction.
I do not suppose that the subs: was enacted for
any other purpose than to meet Sir F. Piggott's judg-
ment.
Section 3.
"or without" to be modified in case of China
Companies.
Section 4 (1) (ii).
After Colony "or China".
It is essential that the registered office of
companies doing business solely in China should be in)
China. It would be a matter for the Order-in-Council
to say at what ports such office might be, clearly
Treaty Port, otherwise Chinese Companies masqueradi)