124
.O IN OT
(II\@8208)383,ol dotuyaub Troy of JonSTOTOT A÷IW
to eximple of om anivoradani,Jawi redh:soaⱭ br9s edp to
Medc bearso bod dohdw aпozer und demvoo saenuqul ede
to admonebørd add redutasy of sortsy of nerd dusJA¶
moxanol de 0879dalget vnwqmoë 9jdonsaib dafting ent
3i moina to yqou,sbidol &monely of ecoй 3 bygdarbhe I
Wittwered beaofone
eved I doldw to yqoo viqo" s'yone[[eox} cili nI
el Tovodaow somereton on,uolone of Tromod ent oals
srid to Vallidwoflqqwn? odd to rottwerp odd of eban.
to beltoimoo akyti daitirá od wad at TM ouT saensqeb
Jom vroloq dadd to saо594 по godanoH at beredarger
-et sie tot aroaser CNT
-YJASTI Ant of beredbe gnived
OJ VOTISIImia to auro yronibro od 913 Tetalger of Isart
"Quaisin" and Farmer Boy" marks from Dr.Kishi, the
From Dr.Kishi's
Patent Agent who had the case in hand.
reply, copy of which is enclosed herewith, it will be
seen that the question itself has been settled by the
Registration of the marks in the name of the British
American Tobacco Company, which is a sister concern of
the British Cigarette Company, and that he thinks no-
thing could be gained by pressing matters further.
on For convenience of reference I have the honour to
enclose copies of the marks referred to in Viscount
Uchida's Note, as well as of the "Quaisin" and "Farmer's
Boy". As they are entirely different it is clear that
the Japanese Foreign Office have purposely avolded
raising the general question of Hongkong trademarks,
for it is evident from Dr.Kishi's letter, which formed
the enclosure to your despatch No.252, that they were
well aware of all the circumstances relating to this
„X“AL DUTSðalger vb39TIA NA
case.
od drigin of DOTTSter axran edt duit banesa †i aA
-mi I dodaqaab rosy mi banoidnam suond wort dastettib
erit to a lyos alwudo od bouddA Delorem.o0 ert betorte
"nielsuo"
sidervoпoH Jal
̧¶.m、eted Verð biswhF THE
348
58
(Signed)
I have &c.,
Claude M.MacDonald.
Zpl