were caked for, the total cost of the milding; ! exclusis & architects' fees, not to exound
$500,000. The pres M. made the total up to about
uns than 3 storeys & $525.000. The wilding abasement.
The accepted tunder inclusist (foundation, odrainage
Camm
K
the
Ctis had * $500,000 hat ncommended the addition of a starry, question of the extra cost was refered back to the architects who thought it to he $75.000 phus fee $3750 making a total of $603,750.
Sir it. Blake (then [er. ) decided that the best mativals were to be and, & apparently
L
Lo
woult of this the estimate put forward the architects, exclusist & foundations, was $649,950, which with foundations estimated at $134.000 + extras amounting to $34.000 came to a total of $875,950 exchesis of fees. But the lowest tinder mas $13900 more than the estimate & with fees came
to
This was accepted in 1905
$872000.
The foundations me
completed in Jannay
198
when work on the superstinctive commenced.
Then der M. Sathan wanted a
bringing estimated cost up
e We Wors
to $930,000
So for $1,040,000 had heen spent up
the 3" fet last to the hilding wasn't finished
claim for $40,500! The contractors put
mi a
(about) for the delays caused [Ex! what got $23.600 for which the S. & S. attoral havd been asked, but not yet pirn.
The Committee which uported
on the matter
in June 1912 found that considering the stylis Cconstruction the total cost was not excessist but they find that there was avoidable delay.
caused by
(1) Detention of wrf plans for 2 years before
Many
weu
rjutel
13) Quanels between M. fisher, the Executive
бидней in change, & the Architects Augand the pist & there the D. P.4. says
the A
ign
in)
were mult withe the question is whether they ni time to admit the recessary changes hung mader: Io maintain that they were
as
i