.Y 400
judgment appealed from shall stand.
,yınjerceĉ Isirolo? .noĦ
.divered [[} JTC
of as badt:n os si bns eno troda a ei IIi8 SAT
eketqu” a'quesjavi ail to egiul ei 20 sonsbredde elk tot abivorg and to soivise jasna.neq ei ni neybuj eeteid ertedw ani10 ni Jaucl .eldali vs Jon sis ynofe0
Jaixa aut oi ejnamomols vis88-oen erið nexsm oain JI
egnut bring a to zasutato go end of ladnebiomi esonanik10 gai- end no moitalaigal 19.Jwt eriøper of Jon as bojlari os si ina .eybuj brist dowa to dremd ni oqqa :di no exam od noidevisedo gaivoliot sit even I
Jnungzieq suráð era erent nedy Jarit nobivony zimt :Samal to eno yns to noieiseb eds mot? Iseyqe na yrolo) edi ni segbut Ils Jneveng novewon don acol JI .eej Tacão eid of sil Ila. » mæld doidw,mend neowde. beynstus oe îi rendgend griddle meybuj esult ent,aeonstemporis Innoitqeerə ni oa ed yino blow tide.wserq Bejout end to eno evsel IIiw di es eldsniesh snitt I ei saumio Risenga dove To gaitsed end gabruk frow tento no yitso of eenl ni dhow end øgruj bridd a lo Jnewnioqqs edo no enantedtzut bas gild neewtad bedsoolls yineve srom ed Iliw noitoibainuj Ienişiro .e but enaju“ można? eda bna ecitaul Tsino
■'ydes tall BiH to egoul edt of eonebeeeng sevig einf:Ɛ saual) to soicaut leidü siv od Joandrio,ga mi reinea îi anido el troð Toime?" moinsengue and doobs od Jiusiîtio brwol new JI .ynoɔznok -zed Isium bitnou m'edsd2 to viajeroeĉ ent mi bedaeggua "egħut To ∞ idaul Teino erdvi a .g.* .¡¡VI ‚redmetqe2 .dJVS to dodaq- ynolo) zento emoe ri soil10 [sioihut, bled svmi yeu egbut enaing -sele dnazdnioqqa deilt sin to stab end mort roines ed you has Anido I si sausio ent „anin) ni troð allt to egbut end of ezerw- .yðingidma te biøveb bebineb won
•Idariaeb a noiniqo ym ni adomila (S) neitosa-dua ¡Aamala a eoidaut leido odd seviş Josberq da do inw was eit to synedo a zi erent med Jalid eebivorq ji bns edov gnidaso no elsvob and rei degod gniddie sezboj, owd edd neewded noinigo to somerellib
Sub-section (3) retains the priority in the
373 decision of the Senior Judge where the two judges differ, when sitting otherwise than in appellate jurisdiction, but contains new matter by conferring the right on any party agrived to appeal to a Full Court of 3 judges.
Clause 5: retains appeals in interlocutory matters etc., to the Full Court of 2 judges giving to the Court of three Judges (with the Judge of the Court in Chine) jurisdiction on appeals from Original Jurisdiction. The retention in the existing Full Court of appeals in the matters specified is certainly necessary and the hearing of appeals from Original Jurisdiction will probably take up all the available time of the Court of three judges.
Sub-section (2). The suggestion of the Secretary
of State that the barrister to be temporarily appointed by the Governor should be of 12 years standing is, it is submitted, not practicable here owing to the scarcity of barristers available, and seven years standing at home qualifies a barrister, I think, for appointment to the County Court Bench and ten years standing to the High Court Bench, whereas in India the qualification to the High Court Bench is five years.
Clause 7: The Ordinance will not come into operation until the retirement of Sir Francis Piggott.
I deem it unnecessary to insert in the Bill any reference to the dates of hearing appeals in the case of the Full Court with three Judges (including the Judge of the Court in China) as I think it had better be a matter of mutual arrangement between the Judges but of course the present scheme would be adhered to i.e. two sessions of approximately fifteen days each in the year, and the dates would necessarily be determined some-
by -time in advance of Sir Havilland de Sausmarez and the Chief
Justiœs of this Colony.
I will draft a short bill to provide in
future for bi-monthly sessions which I believe is considered