Y 400
3
SLA
a ni
nova Isiloco .nok
clucy di JAY conconi eĩ of yine welcoødeng pbrotta Ca oza ikiny pociti ad mo8£ 8*1.4 48. Vind to tednun and gend
1
V BI KOMİ, Markus to mlangoni og død forodnijon Jun to di mustra wdp
2
Kondoa mĂ CĂ 27% ecunim draf yn to AI doet perng zalivus egeriti ens cankaya besong of ma noidiev-
yo si exong dard emosyon ei ar daO PAJNÓR WH010.
pi polcom game
.9* 8001Q
L
anie byli padettik prizes cheng Iles du aroliston ekanid) to ease und QJ Awee Wrott Luota.ob ginenwiqqué end to IIV olvidal and redza
broll: o adatrolou dranToVOD 949rino end* UNE ne,coidadini „Jnowoyaistai Jenise exam. manj majcing of moldoetorq ."evoojowe asenino v sobi divi ofnstvolos
.6
rouse und doim baituives go luon me ovu. Iliy t..so sid siia,fiem-usjnoDQ Sid
¡les:you sʼbrud .I tih nog) bread ♬
ano, nieodos niebuc
to I ololent to dgorjerų
mud mod seal nincun
ek na bmwol nd IIIr geble nood no runsaugte end and abhe wi orond to Insure, Juterno 8 19jla 18: Q. PI:9018 JI „bedoso33 Bedonia, Auto areiv ad de cua „noidireyso lone or si arend dend
.Iasión.i
*
gadunim
¡ÏNGI Pİ 9ra sobie
Indrewbout a Ji eden bluor reuzero pobrud e
vine don noidlo, nas ni Bedayol) He donc noitrovare uns do goidinu00 Bluste kan østle shine noir oele pd exta. tomt sidansiyon ddiw disoing to buy: edd no píules benicar ed Isomme erol-gito90h J'ler: s*ing 4 112 #roqqua vais vea or na diet ‚æenido ni Tosu bad de jare 9 am en bounderi 101 #ws (77%. to noijinitel rebiv a driv slad ni Todesul tejsecoin-off? .odunim desi pe to Il digerjaisq ni droquer riend ratuudio oni110 misto: sud pal .d‡ši sin le rejdsi
10
17
of Sir F. Lugard's proposal, on the ground that the Secretary of State did not think it advisable to put it forward, and that support- -ed the second paragraph of the counter-draft; but they immediately add the proviso that they can accept the second paragraph only if it is interpreted to bear exactly the same meaning as the wider inter- -pretation of Sir F. Lugard's proposal. "Failing conventional pro- -tection for unregistered marks, in terms adequately explicit, the Manchester Chamber would prefer not to have any convention".
5.
Mr. Crowe informed the Manchester Chamber that the London Chamber objected to the conclusion of a convention because they considered that, if China subsequently constituted arrangements for the protection of trade marks, it would be difficult to object to the Japanese contention that any Japanese who had wrongfully register- -ed in Japan a British mark of which the British ownership had been acquired by user only was entitled to protection in China, as against the British owner. Mr. Crowe, in reply to this argument of the London Chamber, pointed out that even now there was nothing to prevent a Japanese from registering in Japan a British mark which was used by its British owners only in China and not in Japan, so that the conclusion of the convention would not give Japanese pirates any rights in Japan which they did not enjoy before. Consequently Mr. Crowe did not agree with the contention of the London Chamber.
6.
I submit that Mr. Crowe has missed the point of the London Chamber's argument. With or without a convention a Japanese can register a British mark in Japan and in course of time he obtains the exclusive right to its use in Japan. At the present time he may put goods under this mark on the Chinese market, but the British Merchant if he can prove his right to the mark, has a remedy against the Chinese retailers. If the convention is signed the situation as far as pirating in Japan is concerned would remain unchanged; but as regards China Great Britain would have agreed to respect the marks of Japan registered in Great Britain and Japan would have agreed to respect the marks of Great Britain registered in Japan. The inference would be that the marks of Great Britain which were not registered in Japan were not entitled to protection in China against Japanese
infringers,