CO129-387 - Individuals - 1911 — Page 233

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

See also the derp on 33935 (mm. Taylor may find himself in a very important position if he tries to insist).

We add that a copy of this letter is being forwarded to the Gov. and that he can, if he wishes, make further representations to the Cove, after his return, but that there seems no need for him to forego the extension of leave granted to him on medical advice.

We did what we could to get what he claimed from the S. A. Govt. but they won't pay, and we can't help it.

Copy to you. Conf. 31 Alonce '31 Sir

REC 34133 226 HOLLAND F25 OCT || 35 ADDISON ROAD. W. 21 October 1911.

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your letter No: 31508 of the 17th instant, and to offer the following comments thereon.

As I have not yet been informed of any specific charges against me, (beyond the vague and general one of having failed to exercise adequate supervision over my subordinates), no explanation is as yet called for from me. My previous letters of the 1st and 16th June last were not of that nature, but dealt with my position in Hongkong by reason of the treatment accorded to me and the Harbour Department by the Colonial Secretary, and certain misapprehensions entertained by His Excellency Sir Frederic Lugard in his minute of 19 November 1910, respectively. It is true that, in that minute, there is an implied censure for my having failed to put in writing a certain order issued verbally by me; but as that order was admittedly received by the officers concerned, I cannot think that this, alone, is the reason for my having been mulcted of $750. I am therefore still at a loss to conceive what the ultimate reason may be, and hence am unable to present my side of the matter.

The theft of the money took place just a year ago, and I remained in the Colony for more than three months after that date. At any time during that period I could have refuted any charges made against me. Yet no such charges were made, but instead I was judged and condemned unheard. The Chinese employees...

The Under Secretary of State Colonial Office

Edit History

2026-06-11 02:22:18 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

See also the derp on 33935 (mm. Taylor may find himself in a very important position if he tries to insist).We add that a copy of this letter is being forwarded to the Gov. and that he can, if he wishes, make further representations to the Cove, after his return, but that there seems no need for him to forego the extension of leave granted to him on medical advice.We did what we could to get what he claimed from the S. A. Govt. but they won't pay, and we can't help it.Copy to you. Conf. 31 Alonce '31 SirREC 34133 226 HOLLAND F25 OCT || 35 ADDISON ROAD. W. 21 October 1911.I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your letter No: 31508 of the 17th instant, and to offer the following comments thereon.As I have not yet been informed of any specific charges against me, (beyond the vague and general one of having failed to exercise adequate supervision over my subordinates), no explanation is as yet called for from me. My previous letters of the 1st and 16th June last were not of that nature, but dealt with my position in Hongkong by reason of the treatment accorded to me and the Harbour Department by the Colonial Secretary, and certain misapprehensions entertained by His Excellency Sir Frederic Lugard in his minute of 19 November 1910, respectively. It is true that, in that minute, there is an implied censure for my having failed to put in writing a certain order issued verbally by me; but as that order was admittedly received by the officers concerned, I cannot think that this, alone, is the reason for my having been mulcted of $750. I am therefore still at a loss to conceive what the ultimate reason may be, and hence am unable to present my side of the matter.The theft of the money took place just a year ago, and I remained in the Colony for more than three months after that date. At any time during that period I could have refuted any charges made against me. Yet no such charges were made, but instead I was judged and condemned unheard. The Chinese employees...The Under Secretary of State Colonial Office

Baseline (Original)

:}See also the derp on 33935 (mm. Taylor may find himself in avery implorant position if he ties to insist uRmspuifechanges add that a copy of this letter is being forwarded to the Gov. and that he can, if he wishes, make further repsere sentations to the Cove, after his return, but that there seems no need for him to forego the extension of leave granted to him on medical advice.(We did what we could to get what he claimed1813 from the S. A. Govt. but they won't pay, and19888. we can't help itCopyworry. to you. Conf.ht 31 Alonce '31 SirRECсо 34133 226 HOLLAND F25 OCT || 35 ADDISON ROAD. W. 21 October 1911.I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of yourYou letter No: 31508 of the 17th instant, and to offer the following comments thereon.2.As I have not yet been informed of any specific charges against me, (beyond the vague and general one of having failed to exercise adequate supervision over my subordinates), no explanation is as yet called for from me. My previous letters of the 1st and 16th June last were not of that nature, but dealt with my position in Hongkong by reason of the treatment accorded to me and the Harbour Department by the Colonial Secre- -tary, and certain misapprehensions entertained by His Excellency Sir Frederic Lugard in his minute of 19 November 1910, respective- -ly. It is true that, in that minute, there is an implied cen- sure for my having failed to put in writing a certain order issued verbally by me; but as that order was admittedly received by the officers concerned, I cannot think that this, alone, is the reason for my having been mulcted of $750. I am therefore still at a loss to conceive what the ultimate reason may be, and hence am unable to present my side of the matter.3.The theft of the money took place just a year ago, and I remained in the Colony for more than three months after that date. At any time during that period I could have refuted any charges made against me. Yet no such charges were made, but instead I was judged and condemned unheard. The Chinese The Under Secretary of Stateemployees Colonial Office

2026-06-11 02:22:18 · Baseline

View content

}

See also the

derp

on 33935 (mm. Taylor

may find himself in avery implorant position if he ties to insist u

spuifechanges

add that a copy of this letter is being forwarded

to the Gov. and that he can, if he wishes, make

further repsere sentations to the Cove, after his

return, but that there seems no need for him

to forego the extension of leave granted to him

on medical advice.

(

We did what we could to get what he claimed

1813

from the S. A. Govt.

but they won't pay, and

19888.

we can't help it

Copy worry.

to you. Conf. ht

Alonce

'31

Sir

REC

со

34133 226

HOLLAND F25 OCT ||

35 ADDISON ROAD. W.

21 October 1911.

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your

You letter No: 31508 of the 17th instant, and to offer the following comments thereon.

2. As I have not yet been informed of any specific charges against me, (beyond the vague and general one of having failed to exercise adequate supervision over my subordinates), no explanation is as yet called for from me. My previous letters of the 1st and 16th June last were not of that nature, but dealt with my position in Hongkong by reason of the treatment accorded to me and the Harbour Department by the Colonial Secre- -tary, and certain misapprehensions entertained by His Excellency Sir Frederic Lugard in his minute of 19 November 1910, respective- -ly. It is true that, in that minute, there is an implied cen- sure for my having failed to put in writing a certain order issued verbally by me; but as that order was admittedly received by the officers concerned, I cannot think that this, alone, is the reason for my having been mulcted of $750. I am therefore still at a loss to conceive what the ultimate reason may be, and hence am unable to present my side of the matter.

3. The theft of the money took place just a year ago, and I remained in the Colony for more than three months after that date. At any time during that period I could have refuted

any charges made against me. Yet no such charges were made,

but instead I was judged and condemned unheard. The Chinese

The Under Secretary of State

employees

Colonial Office

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.