I
favour on the strength of their exparte
statements. If Bowley's my pull
seems to me to dispose f
memo
the contentions mised
both bung
Mens D. L.D. in 20630 !c. Bulkparti
statimento
My Barley's in the so considere
1 M.
the d. t. Las Bjudge to tilla them
the Eridumer produced by M-Aarly is at in Fares of the Gort.
news
iend copy of this litter to the Eor, and
ach mini
to inf the writers that the reply
to their pression's litter was eat through the
for n-aceritance with tol kepp, 214, 213,
Theyy
the invariable practice in the car
communicatio
raide
copes & which he sand and to them at this fruity
the S. S. Las caufully considered this contentions in the Colmi 400.
my that is
they were sigt. by the Sor. he
Led come to the comburion that there was
no med to amend the oras. that he
DEACON, LOOKER & DEACON Solicitors & Notaries.
HERDERT W. LOOKER.
F. BANKINGTON DEACON.
TELEPHONE No. 285.
TELEGRAPHIC ADDRESS:
"OTTERY," HONGKONG,
A. B. C. Code (5th Edition), Western Union (Universa} Edition),
AND
Broomhall's Imperial Combination Coda,
20630
R
52423
Prat 6 OCT !! Des Vieux Road,
Hongkong,
15th September,
-1911.
74
Luo ho budet
modits to change
his decision
چول
"the letter is obviarly intended to to opposin
I would forward
my Robinso
propo
? Puth
(as amended) fil 13 alone,
Dr.
Sir,
We have the honour to refer to our letter to you of
the 18th April last.
2. On the 9th August last we were informed by the Colonial
Secretary of this Colony that the Secretary of State for
the Colonies has received your letter of the 18th of last
April but is of opinion that Ordinances No.39 of 1909 and
No.6 of 1911 should not be amended in the manner suggested
by you".
3.
We
We must strongly but respectfully deprecate this
indirect method of reply. A letter to you from a firm of
Solicitors in England would receive a direct answer.
are unable to see why a similar courtesy should not be
extended to English Solicitors practising abroad.
Our
letter enumerated the various points on which our Clients
contended, they were not getting fair treatment, moderately
and respectfully put forward, and in respect of which our
Clients felt they were aggrieved and justly aggrieved owing
to the Ordinances of the Local Legislature and the decisions
-1-