2 month's half pay leave at a late date (is because he thinks his time now in England is deducted from the leave he will earn on his return).
The Governor suggested that Mr Baker's new appointment should be pensionable. In respect of his new appointment, Mr Baker was granted a leave and a free passage home.
We replied that the bonus could not be sanctioned, but that Mr Baker's old appointment should count towards his pension (under the pension minute he would count 23 years of his time), and that he should be regarded as having spent 1½ pay leave in England.
Mr Baker was allowed the cost of his passage to Ryland on his new appointment.
It now appears that Mr. Baker has already been paid the bonus, and that several other officers have been awarded similar sums of money, none of which have been reported to the Secretary of State.
Mr Baker does not consider that the grant of pension rights in respect of his previous appointment in England is a suitable compensation for the loss of half pay leave while in England.
I think that we must agree to allow him to keep it, but that he must under these circumstances (a) surrender pension rights in respect of his previous appointment, and (b) his new appointment must be regarded as an entirely new one, with the interval between the two appointments being treated as a break.
}
2 month's half pay leave at a late date ( is because he thinks his time now in Gland
is the deducted from
the leave has will eam on
The Governor enggested
^
taty of the
o 124381
that Mr Bakers should receive
a
totall
new
M
afforintment
his return to the colon that this affomitment should be pensionable
In respect of his Ad affointment, Mr Baker ove granted a loves &
Was
འ
a prie fassage home
We stu replied
that paper that the bonus could
but that nothe sanctioned
in retien Mr. Bater's old
affomitment should count towards his pension (under the pension minute he would count 23rd
that he should of his time) a
(
11⁄2 pay leave
be regarded spent the found better he in Ryland
Mr Baker was
to a concesion
ove allowed the cost
of his passage Bylan!.
new
affitat
19
It now affears that Mr. Baker has already been paid the homes, and that several the piers have
bea awarded sums
a similar band,
If money. I
none of which
have been reported to the 's of S.
15.
Mr Baker does not consider than
pension the grant of pension rights respect of his thom previous
in
affomtrent
Gland Aging ut
a
Y
of half for while in suitable confensation
toms, a
for the towns has been paid to him
with me
ds
I think that
the
money
you agree
must
we
to allow him sheep it, but that he must
under these
crccinstances (a) surrender pensio
A
rights in respect of his previous afflict (b) his afftent must be regarded a
& his period
an entirely England
As
new one.
Lin
interval between two
of different afflict
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.