I this case
defend entirely upon the qualifications of Dr Valenzuela, a I
do not see
that the boy
in new
forwarded by 44210/08
can to maintain
how we
have not got a
the inform
a case
I which
wa
HM. representative on
Refly on the inthesenconf
the above remarks, Ladding that the S.AS. consider that the ment,
1
the Cos
case defend upon the reality of the qualifications held by Dr. V. and the question of whether
by
mative
manh
a
question of Dra's rights the cometness
or otherwise in diagnosing trachoma, I do not think that after this (apse of
Viême tthe 376
company could expect to get any thing. But.
It mar
appears that, even if the
гист
hen admittedly suffering from ever posible
had
diverse, the cared not to excluded withinal
the Constitution (see page
a
breach
7 g
ish
gite
endosme) The follming passage
slightly burn but it seems clear
that I medals
hos sie a exclusion om
that
hen amended
the cast Nation
$ allow
on grounds of public health.
these facts
he was actuated that it would affear
of
and
W
the papers, the
from their "inform = contained in 44200 47465 that his news were abnormal that the Mexican gost
we
inclined
prepared
bnt that in
(concur in this view
absence of further inform hran representative, to be the 575
singgrant is
particular
this
HM
camont
t recommend
not prepared auffatinine of action by the
As regards "A" in the at- minute. I count
agra
These papers introduce
ROW 216
a
new
faul
of supreme importance. If it had hem
Sout in 1
new Sout
Aless th Mustico
settle
AL
а
are
coretly stated
no curbradiction
there appears to he no
cas appear
a bau
dear claim for compensation: The
amount claimed is
links that is
а
dacbtless excessiv
matter for repasate treatment
-preferably In additration
1
Write
Sinding then copy
if
di
there lives to 70
reporting
15924
*
that
say
the to. are advised that the legal
point is sound
ний
that
for da
El the Jain,
high and
the matter of without ou
arlikante
intervention
^
૪
the
ofs
considers
Representative sat supporti
Kivite
the
the amount
BU
oghuesico
二人
Al 5
†
į