salary only; of
(b) Allowing him of he wishes
also
contribute, at the rate
^
the Mais Suly pay
post.
But J
ما
8447%
A
war of
his permanent
think that if he
(at a rate based
elects to contribute [
he
on his Suly pay.
must contuine to do
when he is
on
leave
on
half ho
full salam without salary. salary or
m-Stubbs
says
that this would
br
a
heavy
burden
on
a
man
half salary. But the Suty
allowance of
дрий
دنیا
evin
a
AA Class I
I understand only
£ 200 a year
The contribution
that (xf200) is £8
$
б
13/1
month
4
a
a
year,
not
very
nerotus.
But if you allow him to reduce
his contribution each time he goes on
they
will have to
a
fresh
leave, you calculate register for him
w40 pension. You will this complicate
still mon
his
wTo pension account
(which owing to incremental scales
almady
__
is
too complicated). I don't
to day
that the opposite
coun
is impossible, but I
the Evadvantages outweigh the
advantages.
of (a) and (b);
thunk
359
J
incline
to (b). If officers whose salary + Suty pay
or
very
is no
grater
their
little greater than
old salary + 10% kemporary allowance
requins to contribute
rate (course (a))
higher rate (
Shte
they
(a)) they
at
a
ay
to complain - especially if
or widowers.
will give
confirmed bachelors
am
Course ((^) however
opportunity for
officers whose requirements
art
just met by the who pension
system to contribute more
aut if
the husband Soesn't avail himself
of
the
will be
opportunity good
a
and Sies, the ro
auswer if
his
widow complains that her pension
is smaller
De Collins
than the Expected
Subject bang fucèr
al
Move from fom, I agree. I think it is clear