suggesting
This vighs.
Sour, y
We have been pressed by the S.S. for an increase in W. and 0. *
pensions. They are certainly very small
)
+
and as
may
*
te sm
? 3
the amount depends upon the amount of an Officer's
contributions, I think it would be unwise to let
him escape paying 4 per cent on his duty pay. On
the other hand, i would not make him pay the 4 per
cent when he is on leave, and not receiving any
duty pay at all. I would rule accordingly both for
H.K. and for the Malay Peninsula.
in certai
when the contribution started la
or th
life was much than the h but the ca value of
it will make the computation of Widows' pensions a
rather more complicated, but not to a
extent.
AVC
serious
Mr A. J. Harding
does anything
Ggen
358
this from the point gris of the w. to.
Fund?
Fr. 18
mă Fiddes
The Sespatch is rather muddled, but the first thing to be decided
is whether Suty pay
Две should be regarded
salary and be liable to the Seduction
of 4% as contribution. I
think I asked
whether this
ES
fair life. policy
mă Stublo
some
trine
ago
the letters
of
thad been settled.
Robuson & Macdonald (26687/11 FMS)
clear that the 24% will be
J
all
that
selection
of mesors
On looking at the desp. again I think the Gov.
only means to ask whether 4 per cent should be
paid on duty pay when it is not drawn. I would
rule in the negative both for H.K. and Malaya.
The man who would elect to pay under Mr. Stubbs'
suggestion can use the money fer by exercising his
prudential proclivities in some other way,
to give a choice introduces an unnecessary
plication.
Arc
and
Com-
it is
charged
་་
on
"salary"
not on
the
Suty
and I
)
Son't
allowance.
think that the
that the Sefuition of "salary"
15 includes a
§2 of H Kong Oro" & 156
allowance"
no
as
08
to the policy
objection to
(2) laying down
contribution should tr
"Suly
that the 4%
on
the man's