.7 103

. DIO

ad no board at yeilspolton univitetu sobi Iestovinu SAT adhd" to quent) end ud somigells ein Do dano wao eno on ĉend sigionirq to Bellqui rc B&DIqro Bonoussiepos ade duonaiw di Bowo on tioLLY OF Langm aut niya. edd no heeed ai elyioning ei .etaje no avoto dove smol?». Ils mi unida siqloping and wilt di port mo gAIS 3 MBİTJ30 enoll i uro wa kuito s no:29тd asde: yoilereldan doby no nevero

-

At Ji quce HI .wal to ameJE R JIerollib roww teltic board ei í (val no 300 yd brel ri at war si e:) murid to 99 ly ond no dase-

-300 B Mẹ Ki“ a stondo ni hea erod¿ssons ela. most dieone

I STOJBADIS VÍS MOTI JOS080/

*

m stendo

geend 10 .atod me. To noidamid-

-000

es old c.AT $29,

$

be, Jindan vi .i,ai wel of boixan 9:00 00 somme,ba dad bruot mode se di balik ni dost ni .Jusinov- nude of macud av nutid, no Jus rogab paies völinnoitur to eigioni mom 100 að að arois q ere to ndisi demo sviecocorm qd „dalu Closer wid

Ilfo#Tobn238) J

10 mod Iwo be exorld Toudor) nsubli...o 'edosidan vllandrove mod goveteur (sdoojdue boailesudu.

swd clomino no dɛon dual od suno de nu a win

eid. . omejil no

Jones oldne ivori

gemolo w: Isw.

1-650 vd polob a at „dosjúce atud

MEN Holt saja, ser to přitojali Jвery and eten” gnoljnok as dove

DJ BOAT 14 Jaunia 3 plus.

'

LE BISTIQ Tİold Miave,engelliv oviden tiens to Ja ta gaizol menima IsntBeom visad mi wrogo yon 21 belkoon od ov end.

પ „pleuras edaod Dr. Becka (pus nandude bize me quiðinle jia ya ¿ĺovitus nobis nullir tiens eð matrebi aiwo quinnetox

na umijas Isture woo is Duisling seenta) - { OVẦN AN MİMC qui nahiellid ouc no Island night jimnena di brothe

#ga qual word,Jand evsilj ou #lfusoqui voionou di

(Rejaliiv

$

dow how dasseeb sonic door natre waf qlimat to medap A TON O ON JO SALLE JÍ TOT qali motos. 0 Joec sod en ilonio to Sueblos. beveilduq tienen odd to sololáns ont damit nid det beroquin Alma jual me to ytesstefoeb nolo «rrow moui yiímoidan esel)

gnofob mavi ugeninin elt so yditojan drar end

316

2.

er willingly divested themselves of their Chinese nationality. Al-

though the auto cession of territory by one state to another

enerally results in a change in the nationality of the inhabitants

the ceded territory this is neither the inevitable nor the legal

ffect of the cession. I think the true proposition is that enunciat-

ed by the learned author of Piggott's "nationality" on p. 88 of Part

where he says:-

*I believe that it is sounder and more consistent with

practical considerations to say, that in case of severance the Hurther nationality of all persons affected depends on their own

free will; but that in the absence of any act from which their

intention to belong to the new state may be inferred, their original

nationality will be held to have continued. This puts the prima fa-

-gies on the side of the old nationality; but it gives sufficient

weight to the fact of residence in the new state*.

In fact the converse of the principle enunciated in the

pening sentence of this memorandum is also true. No state can divest

its subjects of their national status without their acquiescence express or implied. Where, as is now usual, the Treaty of cession

akes provision for the departure of the subjects of the ceding

state from the ceded territory if they are unwilling to accept the ligeance of the state to which the territory is ceded, and the jubjects remain, it is easy to infer from the circumstances that the eded state waives her claims to allegiance over the individuals and that the individuele waive their rights to claim protection from their former lieges. In such cases there is a clear transfer of nationality. Where the treaty is silent on the point the question be- comes more difficult, but again its solution must be sought in the surrounding circumstances, which in some cases may show that the inhabitants of the ceded territory retain their original status absolutely, in others that they lose it to acquire the status of subjects of a new state, and in others again that they acquire the few status without losing the old. In fact nationality unlike

omicile is not dependent on the sovereignty of the soil of the place he has made one's home. Sir E. Davidson at p. 23 of the confidential

Share This Page