that there was no
fegal mißedinment to the
appt na tarrister, nistaning the Trusury
Sobiitor at home- said that
asaid that if necessary
37 Kemp's position
At 4
Soto of the Supreme
Contott king cd. he validated by Ordinance
who accepted it a
It was decided to offer the appt to M. Kemp onbegrently became
29786/10
caked to the Boar
In a dep of the 22th Dec's 910, upting to a suggestion the for that counsel employed
in small prosecutions in behalf of the Attorney
L
Gen sad he paid afer, the SMS.
so said that where possible the (r. Solr.
or his arsistent sad and net such cases.
App
"/dnot
My Cox had minuted on that suppore that the cases before the judges
xifso the Court
are summary cases, cannot hear a Sols, as advocato"
(Su sec 3062 / One 10 1 11871 which permit's
A
solo to practise
as an advocate before.
the Supreme Court in it's sammary
Murisdiction)
-The Gust 9 It King has how come
conclusion that M. Kemp's position as Cr
Bolo.
Ev/36175/1
to the
Eu/34
257
Sols must be validated by law. Hince
the are porto sont home.
The
34576/11.
A
St King Soles (Law Society) want maly qualified vols the appted (o Solo & ! (r. Sols, while the folsel wanted to
Take pomes to appt. any one,
any one, qualified or not with proner & perform artain duties, For P. Lugards non new appears to be that the orginal aft till descrited in para 5 with the amendment grin at the end of that para, and he adopted. This at mean that the like it. anthonge the for to app! any
person who was
Banister
&to app.
BY A-D
any body
qualified either as
Sols to the fort of (Solv
M
the fourt being discated to ensol such persons
A
Lolos & Proctors on the proviso that the right to practise in he himited to
Caris
in which Ent is concerned.
The admmance now submitter.
If temp to practive as
alcons
munhy (2. Sols. amay /
think he sanctioned. The question is whei