3/
in ito
I am
meur
advised that rec. 9(6)
form does not
make it fully clear
that the
method of proof required by
subsection
is only to be
employed when
of proof is,
either
the subject
by
reason
being subsequent in
of its tasequent repeat
date to the
31st Dec. 1911
or of its harving
one amandaat
in the New Reve
order that this
been refeated,
not included
Ed
intention may
made clear, it wa. be advisable that the words
subject to the provisions of
hAL.
hereof"
strut be inserted
at the beginning of subsection (6)
may
the work
in case Sir 3.0P. sendt be
unable to ots so.
eccordingly
Scrib
ib
in
be well.
115,
at star
however be avoided
sec. 3(1) of ordre 19,
the words
hereinafter called
the Editor ; in the second and
thend
limes
deleted and
were added
Editor
as meaning
a meuK
defining
were
subs. (3)
both Sir
F. Piggott and
any person or
persons who
51
Sec.
11
be
akpointed to complete the work.
in it's new form
Shd further be amended by
the insertion
in the last
line
of the
word New
before the words " Perrined Edition
to the
6/ with regard 이
of the Companies Orove
que
to
wh you refer in the last
J
4/
A also
abserve
that
powers conferred by ordre
19 of 1412
are
conferred only Sir Francis Pissolt in his
capacity
Editor
and not
atverbly upon
amy
but amol
herson
ficher person
may appoint
wom
the
to complate
ES
para of ов
approve
your
desfe,
Your
agree
the proposal wa
you have azado in the
bast fare..,
abmitted
alterations
What
the andre
with regard to
Shop hai los shot. be printed
Page 120Page 121
1
N.R.Ed.
it's place in the N.R. Ed. and
that any points in
with it
in need of further
Send be dealt
may
alteration
stand
witte
вид
an
Amending
You will haver
Ondre
learnt. from my