2
Facts. + 3 of the draft till sean salis– facting subject to one small point. 2 think that subs. (6) of the tow the original
amended maght, as it stand, misapprehension. The addition
lead to
1
the words "Subject to the provisions of 5.11 tief "are required at the beginning
A
the subs.
mothai
make it quit plain
12(6)
"and proper person or persons
101
the work.
phon't 1 pak
"cathed to a shed the
Jacqu
out
this
Juenget!
VR.
of proof requires tituls (6) in and
to be employed where the subject of proofh
This
9
its beny is (within b in date to the 30th the 1911
ی سنگی
fubsequent
its having
been repeated to) not included in the
Rew. Eat
Asto paragraphe 5th
of Sep. 20
the fevemoss Cellin
the exclosomes A & B can hand
said to constitute a
"ith Tomme to be p
(hofere
definite apreemin
in the event.
us in 7.7. Higoth dying the to complit-
La
To
din
R.
Para 3
ms clementis
lille
(8) were puts forward the subminion to
the AG as
sugges
Confirmation
apparently not acceptame of
on the then
haus
a defin
There
ham
when
that suggestin
it apreement appears
to have been made with regard to
before fir 7.T. P. Learn the corong
work & that agreement lembleting the work
event
is not embodies in
S. 3
g
The Cridriance.
8. 3/2) would perhaps
Mectionall ments &
he less
amangs
all words between
stuck out.
"As the A. G.
event
"
I think
In duty
alter when i
In Arden
tequire some Conferred & the 7T1 alme
Cherr
ak
5. 3. will
The powers Conferrer
uct exprentsa
any "fis
Mes, it is
it is practicable heady authorize ourful on 31058
JA
include
Auto & making the word
fri 7.T. P many
persons appointed to
work.
in senter
j
Edito
person
Compet
21
a
the new difin in
V. 2.
ه شان
with regard to the Compamis
that the ad proper i
Larue
the last pack
Au
Ċ thin
Poached and
juteromy) Aéc
2
The
4/12
the fevenon's tellin
ст
"ן די
on the which I think con had better have ssc 3/21 of
order i got 1911
alone. Any amendment at this lati stag- would only
cause difficultor with the C.J. and this hardly seems with which hos must. how wet,
this case
refuse to allow this as offatur revision's
I think the new sees of
←
of
precedent colonial laws
are all right, subject
- [1
to the amendment proposed by mer Time on in
sic alby, and subject also to the insertion of the
word "New" before "Revived" in
line of Fre
(1
alace Mr. 12
the last
2.7.1.
11/12