extradition
the subject of
news expressed by In F. Ingard in paras & to 13
6013
the desp; and to having
heard to the the agreement
with for it to take, wenty Vesticks / mangement
which
ins
made with the
Herrony 2 Canton in 1908
Low C.D. litter of the 26th July
(901) reconsidus that
the risk of the infliction of
Torture
for any
is convided the
Cas
ufficently funded against.
бы
(23462/m)
Sonsarte
bard
Date.
8" Sept.
1911
No
321.
ast previous Paper.
12244 68.
14/1
HONG KONG
3/593
Ordinance 23-1911
CO
340
31593
RECR Rrot 29 SEP 1
Foreigners Detention Amendment
Ir conce's Minutes by Ch. Justice Piggott and Ag. Atty. Gene and acts whether in crew of them The repeal of sub-section's referred to
Ans? tre
6th Oct
Joaned 306 Cons 144 Out
Jne. You 377.
22 are you. 40EVO
16 May '12 P12326/12
240. Wt.23,082--50.
09.11 10. A.&E.W.
subsequent Paper
4
-arij.
to costill
Ashes for tel & replich
I adhere to the new expressed on
68.
(1) Sir F. Pegott argues fit That the Extradition Act cannot affly unless it is incorporated or referred to
But the ratradition Act like
eve
:ther art remains in force until it is explicitly
implicitly refeated & tome
a foreign prime.
is
Char
express metad
seems indisputable that the passage Iampone under custody through British teinton, must, unless there law litte contray, potor principles underlying
The A. G. argues (2)
be
governed by the hard
the Extradition Arte
on that sufficient
the