JAN

I

Sõi

PILSPIAMI of list e ̈

Jwo dhe ane Ifix - Totatoil

we mid he protan 101 Juo II o juo gain to etro

i'los mind edad İçaoul of gold in & who real

alivo u

Tot chanting distoittue Jo: ni elcKI

no% bonẫu nd of cala 910 euriye dak gondjai ta oliwer

•"gmt) or ce mi uitettua me mold.licimoqaon nismo

Bon-

1x Sand ba' ile of anisio TO #C

In omnieros „d noqon di dae isa semid ɛuolto.

Italfont .sudut do ni majd

Bye. J .noldxíov ne

no peu, Ji vert "notoplove1

Alfanog › i mordor! olqner, boog to end Jorİù, a

99% od wol! .sayfortwo aronia con bean or AJODJ-

Avolio'r brendoib LATIJAH Sud

eu dofw nois 03

‚poneze uu? Isolv to af so-

:

+

pls micinon dom nou your VAT NOBG1 90

0 010 love uns dove

voukol na...or voð

37 GAA 918 $ 17.qimenbun100

obat roing “i JPN TULONG. U

Ion

word Jon of

s einige cum 4 VC 1- Joy M. Budete bre

moldIcon'.* Moh

SING MARC Defaceri ylibor TeLoving

toknow,llell you Ab tota wew. noiuw nuoro-res vietneo bdniog

iwe able to roi..odni larong SAL

janis. In van hemişe 0. i noisidi8

10. A

Tai ii'l Jui Jok, VEL

Hİ MET O'Hand

gini unicilover nowty

paling et cca19q eind erIS

dain I .nt mi ve da zuby Live Comm I 9oшJuse

COPY. No. 7605/1907.

Sir,

Government House,

20474 Hongkong, 8th. June, 1911.

&

10 JUL II

163

I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of 29th. May, 1911, enclosing a typed copy of your sum-

-ming up in the prosecution under Ordinance 15 of 1907. I cannot

myself see any anomaly in the fact that the offence of which the

accused was convicted would be considered as a political offence

for purposes of extradition and his surrender refused, yet the

offence if committed in Hongkong is punished.

Ordinance 15 of 1907 was based on a principle

already recognised by His Majesty's Government, in the China and Korea Order in Council and was not disallowed by His Majesty. Clearly the offence it creates is not one for which a person

could be extradited first because it refers to an act done in

this Colony and not in China, and secondly because it is of a political nature, and therefore opposed to the principle governing

the selection of the classes of crime to which extradition laws

apply.

If "in this case the Government has discarded the

principles of asylum which we are to afford to political

criminals" it is first because of the extreme proximity of this

Colony to the capital city of South China, and secondly because

the offence created refers not to past acts of the accused but to

active and continuing acts calculated to stir up tumult in China.

I am not aware that the Ordinance was passed on

the advice of the Home Government as stated by Your Honour.

I have etc.,

(Sd.) F. D. Lugard,

*JIAN. 10,

Jo1b17 1, tobianco osna[4

His Honour

The Chief Justice.

Governor,&c..

Share This Page