desaffears, and it to was therefore
quite unnecessary
proceed
to Enact-
to
have enacted subsection
2 of & sext 10
2
for that
particularly
that in new of the
fact that that section 10
the
no according to subsections 3,
Intake effect only
at
a future date when
the old Revised Edition
wift
cease live the
bont cease
statute look of the Coby
that
6. Seeing it has been thought
time, ut dewis the
र्च
9(2)+(3),
beyout of This is the auctio
next tat
Areenall,
requinte to reenact the
Jord provisions of Ord No 16
1886 with reference
trall Ordinances passed after the coming into fore of the Ordinance
A
now catmatted
I think
Rtw
Yes. 87.8.
1)
Mr.
Mr.
Lord Lucas.
Mr. Harcourt.
DRAFT.
you 100/"1
MINUTE.
Mr. Fiddes.
Mr. Just.
Sir C. Lucas.
HK.
Cont
it presumably ought to have her
it was equally
equally desirable toretain those provisions.
35
in fore, with regard
the
to all / Ordenances possed
Since
between the end of 1901,
+ this commencement of
the Ordinance, until
time when the
the New Revised
Edition is issued to
time
it is, until that date, all Ordenances passed
between the 315_!
1901 1902
1991
9
the
2
nd
Dee?
January
June
are not
Adver
governed
the preservation
by the Adussy law
respecting
1
1
the authentic records
the Coloy. I shall be