}
:
Te war fi la.io.
0
COPY.
Sir,
17.
Hongkong, 8th. March, 1911.
340
0
JOJ
0 Miog
We have the honour to address you further in
this matter with the object of asking the Government to amend section 12 of the Harbour of Refuge Ordinance 1909 so es to enable our clients to recover compensation for all the injuries inflicted on them by the construction of the works authorised or validated by the Ordinance.
2.
The principle upon which compensation is given to individuals for injury inflicted upon them by the execution of Public works for the public good is that the burden of such public works should be borne equally by all members of te the community.
3.
Where the execution of such public works inflicts injury on neighbouring landowners who as taxpayers are already bearing their proportionate share of the expense of such works, it is self evident that a greater burden is being cast upon them than upon other taxpayers.
4.
The works contemplated under the Ordinance may be divided into three categories, i. The construction of the Harbour of Refuge proper, 2. The reclamation of a portion of the foreshore and 3. The works already executed without legislative authority and validated by the Ordinance. This latter class of works we understand the Government to contend includes the raising of the level of the Roads in the neighbourhood already done.
5.
Our clients can be divided into three classes
as shown on the plan enclosed in our letter of the 7th. November last. I. Omers of sections or subsections which front only on Reclamation Stree, 2. Owners of sections or subsections which run
right through from Reclamation Street to Shanghai Street and 3. Owners of sections or subsections which front only on Shanghai
Street.
6.