ude stangne:
and 3. Owners of sections or subsections which front only on
Shanghai Street.
ER
6.
Yendur ung sagthie 34 zonod súd even ef
brude od dvoranavoð sdi gridao 20 foabdo edi dile totsna
* JA KORI @vmanlie) squish har tufull and to SI Ao13594
3
རྟ་
r ·
↑ moltum 700 Cevode:
sential wat qd betooler yo basi coifbre
mbar mogu sighaning ef
*
* boog >Aldv, gut not caver olid, ↑ 96
U slings Jarod ed elsew adrew alm
AIDA (SAANuer såing done to anitueeze ait eradi
Our stemroh,ut uniquøddglen no que fal
18 admirojony Thudi gnitend (bastia
Jasbiva tisa ni 1 adrow do
tava alle to 97
ad uzbrd rotary A JAK
.279 64x80 rodda nogy KRAJ mert godu 2880
E!སན་ T9-01 29$utomatuos astow edT
moilo, né nie0 942 .1,3aikoyajua gerdd esmi bebleib
e molten e to asi tunaloat ex.3 Tegory #g/193 to suoďIBÏ:
Jordin badumuza ghostle adtor SIT „G bea predp9%o" sud
.escent *) v.2 td betwhåfør bus (7kroutza eritefaigei
and brederendu 97 adnow to BAHİS 19738 I
Ti monof gad to Ievai saj to guleist såð pabulont
.snob (basalu boonquod
298BALO 99*9 odai bebivib eď neo vimeife x.o
170 AIT *o tatei nuo ni berolou rely ea no mrode
gina de dold enoutreadue to atsiduow to eccowo i
coitopenae to anolivoa to wsmo
•
TO ADD WAR on heaztë noitamelosh or a data aber
Section 12 of the Ordinance limits the compensation payable in respect of injuries caused to our clients in two
ways. 1. By limiting it to injuries caused by reason of the access to the sea from their properties being interfered with and 2. By confining the right to recover even this limited amount of compensation to those owners of sections or sub-
sections whose property fronts upon Reclamation Street.
7.
It is quite obvious that the works under the Ordinance
do and will seriously affect the property of our clients in
many other ways besides interfering with their access to the
sea.
8.
The right of access to the sea is enjoyed by all the
owners of sections or subsections of the Marine Lots in
question whether fronting on Reclamation Street or on Shanghai Street in a greater or less degree and accordingly if it were not for the arbitary limitation of the right to compensation to owners whose sections or subsections front upon Reclamation
Street, the owners of sections or subsections fronting on
Shanghai Street would be entitled to compensation for such
injury as they could prove to have been inflicted upon them.
As it is they are entitled to no compensation at all even in
the case of an owner who could prove conclusively that his
business was entirely destroyed by the works under the
Ordinance.
9.
The Ordinance in the matter of dealing with the rights
of owners of property on Shanghai Street is inconsistent. For
as it stands, the owners of sections or subsections which run
right through from Reclamation Street to Shanghai Street can
recover compensation for the injury done to the whole of their
property including the portion fronting on Shanghai Street,
-2-