Vasvotout Ininofob .nol.
qoiy to? Tilqge brewo... I
I
29 18 0001 To bac ead Juoda Juadreq50
sockio,ea pe un dot copanib:0 @yniblind tot nosatovo er
mt var „I .Coed your da ni miscot qız10gled a no KINO SA 10 .Ianya Jai si no evidwo ei. qu ode, blvora a balotai (quod .1) stadnijad udiloi sold
Joly ri micom 3 ud min 910lvd nu bollwo
to sadounina, Jeroll szedok naur. Je mo Sucu Bud navby
ani C, "sictimai bus daɔG" gnieu épan
*mediuluota:
fin. si
(mumok, a onima ni I
2011/000 que bardh
Kim up lis
JLC YS. JInt
1
...
one ple
an and whiuqço kin qu a sú ur min 10t
bal on tudta fernwood Jron wd to grind--
mad og biroz sl.,Jamudioyol e
DAGITA @ 100 all
B. OWN
**
İnan gteftdomí que to evoMDI
OKEMON 9: suivi90
yIdshonaqdi.
Jovanovo,Fiad e graval
[xles 3 300 907 54 RA
aʼlidnom to do isey dani qa. .del nun no JustUnions
menudo Boldus sloužo me busy low wt #grotte od sidoru BAY
groottevő bold 190 @mihipä si: to snu jaillajen yo
menovo Bill Ikur apsig
1010
on ed goxic the belt okt no
Sundh,1 Mirooien. w. beslut 9
.:.
od covelive Juliag
.Y 9 0
228 the Buildings Ordinance Overseers and his withdrawal would therefore cause the least amount of interference with the work
of that office. Under these circumstances, I did not feel justified in recommending that he should receive any gratuity for the duties he was called upon to perform. Mr. Longstaff,
whose place he filled, was a 1st. Class Overseer, the same as himself, but, having longer service than Howard, was in receipt
of his first increment. I do not consider that Howard exerted
himself in any special degree or was called upon to perform any
duties of a special nature. He was relieved of the supervision
of the Post Office on the arrival of Mr. Hamer, on the 8th.
October, and on the return of Mr. Thomas from leave on the
20th. November he resumed his ordinary duties.
Shortly after Mr. Howard's resumption of
his duties, Mr. Perkins, Executive Engineer in charge of the
Buildings Ordinance work, complained verbally to me with regard
to the way in which he was performing them. The complaints had
reference to inaccuracies in reports received from him and to
lack of system in dealing with the papers referred to him. They
culminated in the matter which led to Howard's discharge.
In that case, it transpired that Howard had
entered the house of a respectable Chinese citizen, a member of
the Tung Wah Hospital Committee, and knocked holes in one of the walls because, ask he alleged, in passing along the street, he
had seen what appeared to be a recently-repaired crack in it. The occupied subsequently informed Mr. Perkins that the crack in
the wall had been in the same condition for a number of years and
also that, a few days after Howard's visit, he had received a
call from an Architect in private practice who enquired whether
he would employ him to do any necessary work in connection with
his house. Howard made no report of the matter to his superior
officer, Mr. Perkins, and it only came to light through a letter
from a firm of Architects, complaining that the house of a client
of theirs had been entered by some of the name of Howard, who had
knocked some holes in the walls.
one
As it would obviously be most unsatisfactory