し
As to t his claim,
see 44210/08. It was
in accordance
( apparently) not lodged with
of H.M.'s Minister.
the advice.
I cannot understand the Gov.'s tal.
and I think it is impossible to take action on
so strange a massage. Sir P.Lugard is very
aconomical in cable expenses, and this, com- ;
bized with bad coding, often makes his telegram
far from clear. In the present case i would
telegraph back
Your tel. of 13 Yay not sufficiently expli-
referenc to revolution nor
cit Do not understand/why telegraphic instruc-;
ed/why
understand why
tions necessary
ASC
1.am inclined to think that the Gov. means that
the Revolution offers an opportunity of re-opening and
pressing a claim which was previously incapable of
settlement, and that he wants P.0. to seize the
opportunity.
AC)
wine 190k
The F.O. I have leamt by personal enquiry know nothing of the matter & concur in our action,
A
RFW 18/5
Draft Est. Las
Alc
In
Memo
this case.
of the China.
July 'gos
161
commercial by complained of the vexations restrictions that were
be placed upon the inimigration
1
I cookies transported Hong tog
then from
to Mexico. The grounde
upon which the cookies were refused
the wither county was that they
admission were was
were
doctor
unes a
enffing from trachoma, & the
the certificatio responsible for
Doctor Valenzuela,
possess
who
suffered to poncers v. high qualification his task on the ground of a speind
for
tow which he had made in In the case
east.
the
one ship he In trachoma
(cookers
rejected 404 out of 5751 on board, in spite of the fact that the 518 were those who remained after
333 had
been rejected at Hong Kong after a
a Ir Go Grime, who insfection
had been provisionally offth by the Mean