and pattion to the Secretary of State
to the extent rejaved to above
I think this creum
absolutely fale
stance lays open Howell's conduct to
further consume
and
callo
for
sideration of the whole
cavad
affects his retention in the
It is,
That
The came
отл
Matãs, and
of
however, mecessar
the
so very
Necom
as it Dennie.
to point
neuspaper report of
very defective that except from the
the annexme
regando
строг attached to the chirp
Very uncertain
Justice's letter, it is very
where any of these transaction's took
ampto
place.
annexine
to the Chief Justices
lotter shows that the transaction regarding "the ordering
teamed
Boutter from Johnson
Дер
1897.
As it is possible that
"Each of the other hamractions in questions
C
also took place 14 years ago, and the Secretary of State might regard such a
Externating arcumstance
fact
من
? Wire for the approximate dates
of the several business transactions which referred to para. I of the Chief Justic
Ae.
letter to the Governor.
3
ST. Indor
137
Mr. Fiddes
There is no need to tel. I think.
I would
write back and ass for the dates of toe cusiness transact
tions referred to by Mr. Tudor
•
it seons clear from
par.
3 of the C.d.
s latter that some of then too.
place fairly recently and say that Mr. Howell should
be called on to explain how he reconciles these trans- ¦
cations with his assurances contained in his reply to
the Col. Sec. and repeated in his Petition to the S. of
S.
M. Shibl
the 1946 TCM: 21/6
Prd. 21
Remenid ?
Reply nomin
7
alone
Ay. Ley. Art. 157
"