Excera
omne
month
ar arm
me
Zimme
or threw monto
ome
am
year.
2
(Please see
Sec.
60 of
Ord.
7865
and section 100 of Ord. 1865). The
proposal to brint the term
"not exceeding 7 days
needs further
Explanation, expecially in views of the foremors expressed intention, or wister to meriase punishments in this
nection
ed~~
Section 4 of the Dra. Bill would be improved, and
open
its meaning
less
to misapprehension, if the word
"flogging" were not used
Section
but the
Substituted
mus
4
word
The whole
in that
"Whipping.
This section
brich"
refereny to
Fo
the
be construed
"flogging with a
the shaft, "flogging subut
Expression in the craft,
to the provisions of sec. 4 (2) oshi
Punicipal Ordinance".
by Mr. Riszen
out
As pointed 10334, This kind of
ent is book techmeatly and gennalta
Wipping
punishment- Known
to be
There sums why an more chastic form is sugges by the letter of punishment is sugges
no ford.
reason
of the law, when the intention of the legis.
latine must be constined
J
imposing the
less severe punishment of Whipping or birching The interpretation clause (the 2) of the Piper Ordinance definies "Hogging"
ཟ་
an inchising whipping. Dindor. Ats. Legal Port & Juane !!!
1
Sanction at 12 of 1911.
2
With
J
concur
Lates
3.
13
regard to clease 3 of the off action 17191
Is Tudor's criticism so far
Falling, withi
ancen hid
5
4-0
offences
sac 4 (1) of the Principal orth as
the offade | clause 2! are concerned
c. for there offences women
au
well as me
already, Crable to much stiffer terms of solitare, confinement than 7 days. (see
C
1
orde 2 of 1865, su to; and 5 of 1865, dic 100; and Velisportation orda 8 of 1897 84 3(1)(a)) chuss 3 of the shade, however, also prowiches
not exceeding solitary confinement for women
4 days
un
the Case
of
other offences - u. those
Merch to have rendered therm liable if make
to be flagged. These offraces
at^
set out
some
in are at of the Principent order and for
them the law does not at present provide solitare, confront
The main object of clause ?
A
фин
is no douts to frovide
for solitare, confinement in the find-mentioned case [ under de call of the Principal onder and amended by the offade and with reverd to these it is,
asker Tudor points out, superfluous But it is not superfluous with reay and to
such of the best-mentions offences,
aleate, penishall with solitary conforment.
an
not
with me and to clause 4 of the off or if the principle
of the clause is approved, I would have "flowe
as see 2 of the Principulada defines ploceving
to include whipping and the reference is the class
to Sec 4 (2) of the Princised or makes the
meaning quit clear.
As to the police, of the clause, it seems daiktful