ᄑ
!!!
In 1735) it is enggested
that sentences of less than 5
years
7 little
actual imprisonment (i.l. years nominelly) are d
in the case
we
of crimes much as
anned robber with violence z.
and but no
is made as
for the
a
definite recommend "
Will has been submitted
the Chief Jurolition penalties.
1
minimum
I do not quite understand
means that he
whether the you
will submit other proposals but perhaps the Risley will advise
(1) whether there is
now
any
legal impediment to the inflictine
2
minin
sentences of 7 years (2) whether the abolition of penaltie is generally recognized
advance in criminal law.
an advance
ad
1/ is in
(-3) whethe if the answer to lif
it is
be
is in accord with glich
the negative
for the governor
legal traditions for
t
enggest othe magistrates that poking. the infliction of severer penalties
required
such cases.
What better.
for some triming Definition thy Першій
point dil Ist all his
JR.
H
ᄑ
I think
we hould therefore
Sanction Ord 12
l.f.
Write on the lines of my
If
Mr Ricly concurs,
muute
concurs, enggest
14
that the magistrate, should be adired
truflict severer fenalties in the hopes that they may prove deterrent.
M. Rister:
من
Ord. N. 12/1911
formenty approved.
With regard
Row 1/6.
has been passed
to the other points, may
Maf
I in the first place, call attention to the provisions of the craft Pill entroutled
Clause 3 of this Bill propose
171972
to add
provraa
to sec.
sec. 7 of the Principal of designed, expressed,
Ordinance which is designed,
to render
who
are found guilty
of offences fathing within the provisions of
Sec. 4(1) ome Principal
hable to be sentenced
ment for
Goo
Irdinance
?
to solitary confine
terms" not exceeding 7 days.
other hand, the two Ordinances,
On the other hand
specially dealing with the offences question, expressly provide, already, that offenders of the type under corroideration be condito sentenced to solitary
may
confèment and,
Moreover,
terms of such confinement
That The
not-