to
Chinese Gang, robber something
Sir sous a to think about.
with this reduction no reasmath objection I
be taken to the order in Parliament or are poten
rise [Except
the part of cranks who object to all forms of corporal punishment,
Mr Cotturs
g
A
an
that is ruled out by the word "reasonably
In vizat
Tashes.
65 24
J.J.R.3/4
geircular of 13 August
surprised at their proposing
Lashes
02
I hope that
witte a rédaction,
'
g
"the principle of the offre will
altatifu that reduction will entail an avow
gre
b- approved, though of think that
other wording of the or
There is the Clein audem
risk, of course, that prefering dealt to flogging.
will take 6 complicating
by murder.
? Iclegraft.
his going
Rage byt caufl derfs of my. Fab nuintor of Strokes must b
otherwise
reduced to
24
no objection.
BES 4764
softues
down by Mr Chamberlain, has been made
Ли
•Harcourt the limit
349
"The limit ostirker
to
24
lais
But there is
to reason
why the
Uneviesal.
instrument
used
that used
here.
Stones not be as severe a
As perford
1B33
5744
As proposed; strokes must be limited
to 24.
Surely there thould be some definition
what metrument
ruay
The used by the Court.
be ordered
As the Ordinance is drawn it might the bastinado or an iron bar!
Mr. Cox
$4.5.4.11
in new secting
40196
Mr. Harcourt
As regards the instrument to be used,
they have followed the Imperial Act of 1833. But
if the S. of S. wishes to limit the discretion of
the H.X. Court we can add to our tel. that the Ord.
should prescrible that the whipping is to be either
prescribe
with the birch or with the cat.
Jos
ACC
I think so
HBZ
$4.64.11