:
It suggests to me
^
Aror
definite mcognition
( the 1. MPC. Then is desirable as (in man
new) within the words "shall contine"
imply that the Come has been there
2
right & will remain as
ight.
I think the words "shat be" and he substbited
for
"That contine to be ": this simply means
that the Comm? who of the Agrement in
the shoved to function in it kong territory
is the British
I think, it does any
with the suggestion of formal recognition contained in the present phrase.
XVI
Art III is new: -purely formal.
come be understood that
I must & co.
al
This Agreement, rections & which uitinatily connected with the Raitong agreement, and not be signed until the Rectory regotiations
complete
In fact it wt he desirable that the two
agreement and he signed dimultaneously.
3.0. arked m
before to consult BDT.
and I suppose
me st
M
سد مامه تیدانی مهر
? Send
copy
? Copy
BB. Ct. for thous
281
to 7.0. ark for their news on bot
I as proposer
above, drew attention to
dut. Greg's news
the "Carvention 15. Agreement" question
YJNY
that
subject to
the Mboons if any the B. IT; the
S. J.S. propores to approse the deft, valject also to amendmenty Art IT
Add that
For E. Ery mill recolvet, the
agrement is not the signed until the
railway regotiations an satisfactorily
complated
JR311,
(Irget the belay. (In to pussure (work) ?
the length of this minute
which was unserridable),
for Wollens
to wh
that
As to article TV, it seems
the refce to the I.M. C. in Article XIII practically necessitats farmal recognition. On 16994 / co I have. given what I blew to the good reasons for such recognition. Sis 7. Legard, whowas
I. then against it seems to hall came round article IV sid I think article TV
+
་
&
my Vituo