• 1974
„Eža molt grizuosxT to #92di roh to drogaf
Patonool folnoto0 .00
་
oda odik a žrtpito us blod ov betoonih at
(fotry (137 but can
.** bug sebze qmuda mr „te darkera conmmig
-оInno,[21,"adno VOT 30 odd to sottof wat at boriatmon o78
ord yd (b bus & ni annetaq) odmki 2 MOTA tom two na auto-
,ToÚROVO to .b & eufs betab toten" OČTET
J
18.(vo120.0.7.7 tarit noż¬igo to ets ev ¤Ã
t
*
debI wild to
out to taluosto vuunset” adt hra 2005,odmoonm
boltaktua com a ow 573 colttaq dit moonoo tom håb mobi .AI8I
od* cb Birow cost 3 03 10 asw erafuorin ode to modelo tant
noktası vinn et eniton sted of #ferrer"、nd Batroo vtanibro
gntzodoath to ona:laners Tortory est robinman of bari ow dołriw
bota od nt orov néqinner on ta * anobro &tantra" "rodret or*
orig .boyong nord baf boutonon nav toʻion ede. Ildem no?^^o air (
"wodra of to nonetsen olie no newv alde ne as pouchtve
O .KOJO3Ruttenau qlforw el pomohiro nid bra,Monaldi hones
o* novim orow to...* Jarit bra Indrew ones. anobro oris darit e97378
*T! to en:baeng oft mb *200*,*odr.anon tuoda* pr* t* mar
t
off of ca hra 30** naudo des **do* **nom oɑdua baa
t.
-tawolfot an boxtorom notas`i quodta” nude welvmodni hottsf
el yah omen erit usa biroria T, mis ker not "odmemo“ dom ob I
erit netto Zarið božato oala *o*nst modell 9:2 "polo oft
thid of bonboIvorNoa adnoto ow: of? 01et nt bohmopede ba tto* *
ork tand word vorit JAVO (kodnotnot .** to nonopeng oris ai
Janobro old to weny yout d'air bas anobro piɗ todo con håb ttoric
asobro dona qua soft bolnob adrado ovd OEM
nottab ha an fhuo oba tovo tort take onl3 Be ,bovioson UTOW
naw od 110/antang .** bas,zodaotrod .*d to sorozerq o. 2 at
taris hot!S una" "11od-a” oriz to molteonnum eft de Bo'Iso
.Hobdaunormon down to moltoofIooo" on bat or
Tetas: quodreu mít boles me? but marth .***
Madis o* mit hon boos ton bar er zosterle noitant:iaxo-p8orɔ ni
mi vratotoon Istnolol orið ut tudlovo „dėti to TO‡‡EÏ sid
bolloqnos mood harl of ±3 ́s bonoffa fra jannna o ond of newn(8
228
to do so producing the original letter showing the pencilled
alterations (see Exhibit A). The Harbour Master admitted "tell-
-ing him that he had better alter it" and added "I may have
given him the impression that if he did not alter his letter I
would not forward it". This, in our opinion, was an unsatis-
-factory element in the case.
Captain Taylor stated that it was his
custom as a rule to issue orders in writing, in a book, which
is initialled by the clerks concerned, that he did not do so in
this case, that he considered it important, but it was an over-
-sight and that it used to be the custom to issue written
orders, that the custom fell in aboyance but has since been
revived. He also stated that the two clerks, in aiming the
bills beforehand, were continuing the old system, which had
be on hitherto customary, but which he had given them verbal
orders they were not to do.
Ifr. Messer, in the course of the enquiry,
stated that he could not say for certain that ur. Chan Pui San
was present in the interview referred to by the Harbour Master
in December, 1909.
In view of the evidence we are of opinion
that no Court of Justice would find the charge proved, although we agree that it is probable that some oral commufication of the kind was made to one or both of the clerks by Captain Taylor, and are satisfied that he is giving a truthful represent – -ation of what he believes to be the fact, but in the absence of any written record, and he has admitted departure from the usual custom, combined with the unsatisfactory evidence of Mr. Lenfestoy, we are unable to report that the charge is proved.
Note.
}
(Sd.) W. Rees Ravies. 26.1.11. Sd.) C. McJ. Messer. 27.1.11. (Sd.) Edbert A. Hewett. 27.1.11.
In further defence of the two clerks I would add that in reply to direct questions put by me to the Harbour Master, Captain Taylor admitted that his predecessors had made it a
custom
fo