g H.MG.
has been
ho
hitherto
To assumption
treated by
That
amount of the
The
A
contribution by HMG.
nor be affected by extraneous
Considerations
4
g
Je venue
The memo
Hang Kay
such
ad
pom
[NH
Atar
48/8
missco
معمای
souces
the point.
wo not have accepted
the F.P.O. suggestion & the fact the Treasury proposal may
that
Ar of
bitter than
the pant
of mer
b.
that is braide
a mistake to clove the
Agensies from the Simperial point
of view but that is
the Treasur
for
with neet
side
gthe
wony
a
matter
970. All that
about is the Colmine
:
*
ри
the
Colonial point of view their
maintenance
ራ?
indefensible
As to the opice question: H.M. S.
undertook to contutate substantially
of the loss caused
ろ
policy which they imposed
Hong Kong. This point
prüt
Why
settles)
ę
the Cabinet &
not
ち
the Treasury
if the Treasury by & introduce
external factors wi
must ask 150
Lord Crews to put the matter
life the Cabrict again &to ph Sir J. Murray
If you
No-miled.
thi
? hee Sir M. hather that
The 8.0.0. enfefony
acceptor.
are
mistaken in
wt could have.
that ut
The J.P.O. persal:
that the fo unofficial mentes Camiel cantand that Hong Kang deuren nó profit from
the
agenins & that the expenditure
un
entrel
inm
g
a
funds & that w
single cent from Colmial the is indepersible
agree
visus
d
made
G
the Jun фий & repay pack the policy
&
H. Ms.
< explain that the
contribution
of the loss caused imposed on Hangkang
thas no comectin with the
an
ther question Eff