491

Sorimor.

منكا

I think that $10,0

ham litter than good

An

unurratia

they

ane

witte

03-0

would have.

hut. & gather for

hir Behruus

really ging & gin way

thral about.

the Postal agains & have therefre reduced this present offer pro

C

or make Hang Kany par

ran to

aut

of

one pocket for what it gets with the

مند آناه

&

The lost sentance in suggest this also.

9

р

3

Seew

think it and the bat & ack

will

(with ant gratitude) & say t

Kong carminate to Hang Kemp but that

the Mur d

the sgs fals found to add that

Do

to him & h.

Ifer does not seem. sufficient to meet the

to meet the pledge of K.M,

8.

that

a substantive cabubution

wo ho made ( Refer to pass 9 of

draft in 27816/09

Suggested

#

whic

Wat-

that even in the loss for is it not be accepted with

that lefse

342

gratitude: say

Say commcinating with H.K wa shoh.

wor

out

glad to learn what they propose & gur in 1911 & 1912, panting on

thick the loss

Iajor than in

those years in

་ཞ ་ ༠ . R.2.5.713

Mr. Fiddes

Sir F.Hopwood

We have intentionally abstained from

sending to the Treas. the Est. of H.Kong for the

current financial year until we could screw out of

them some sort of interpretation of the promise

of a "substantial contribution ". For two

reasons

(1) we

want to give no support to tht idea that

the contribution is a Grant-in-Aid, entailing the

usual control of the Treasury over the finances of

the Colony which would be highly embarrassing

and disadvantageous in H.Kong

(2) we w anted to get out of them a contribution

based on

the actual loss of opium revenue, without

undue regard to the sacrifices imposed efforts

being made by the Colony to raise additional revenue

to meet necessary increases of expenditure, apart

from the loss of opium revenue.

The offer of £9,000 approaches sufficiently near-

ly to our request for one half of the direct loss

on opium to justify our policy at least, I

think so on the whole.

-

I would now send them the original papers

in 38537, calling special attention to the

remarks of the Gov. on Revenue in his speech to the

Leg. Council on the Est., emphasizing the fact

Share This Page