*

Government intend to run their own ferry service in

355

connection with the railway. As to this we have no

information but would point out that such a special servios

of ferry boats would in all probability be run at a las8.

We have gone carefully into the two sohemes

for a passenger station on the reclamation put forward by

the Chief Resident Engineer and agree with H.B. the Governor

that scheme 3 is preferable to scheme 4.

We have made

several sketches to see if a satisfactory way can be

isolated found of eliminating the platform near the landing stage,

unduly

for we consider this a rather objectionable arrangement 83 *

separating the platforms of the stations from one another,

BILL

but oving to the difficulty of providing a shunting neck

for the goods yard otherwise than to the sontiward of

tuc passenger station as proposed, we have been unable to

evolve an altogether satisfactory arrangement.

While on

the whole we consider scheme No. 8 the more suitable of the

two, we think it would be wise to join up the platform

near the landing stage to those in the atation either by

extending the landing stage platform or by means of a cover så

way.

We also think that if possible matters should be so

arranged that a train leaving the landing stage platfor

should be able to run alongside wither of the main platforms

6.

Page 360Page 361

#

BALK t

ander

Share This Page