83

.♪ ewcolori

189

Vradoxos2 Intão1o3 .noĦ

sɔnabivo to sojon oɗt détworod brawrot I

.3my dat II raniana sentado odé odal vrispni ode no nodać

9%OW #0378/o owd teilt sát notatqo m ni

.borora

on new shaft oqnails brand end of bregar el

ovisson of caw gure dst tal . sarié wora of su erotød sotshive

(3a/bloƉ .* .notiesup at moltsa oris mort nim vsimɔ04 “Ta

ad dari bisa,nottoa oi? ni Tiéntalq erit not mottolio? odd

ovad tihiin on jade he÷÷imba od jud zelaraq edo beɔubonini (181)

od barkazis en bobbs bail er dypodala mail" "ot #6÷engtočni naed

.@veiriadni and to ono de "bo÷lozo yítseng* od

betastedat aalstag odd to & botiga onia tol

at ?I .*! at Jasistat on ban off tarid betate oriw o880 off? at

odt at dud bevollod od od ura angaønttw $ oɛods Toditore (tiduob

oð eldstur as I entado ode to Progqua al toong Joonib to somonds

aaw od tarit toat odd nasit Tonto boyong good and *) Jant "ova

-bion .*M ja avoltiotat edt at $134 ouce gatist baa z¤ezerq

,usivar 20©A .T (.52)

.Isona0-70%70JIA

interpreter Cheng Sam ever interpreted, and hence the suggestion that this interpreter would not interpret correctly can have little or no foundation in fact. After the appearance before the Registrar the excitement of Mr. Lei Tak Yung when speaking to Mr. Goldring was so intense, that he Mr. Goldring could not understand him, and turned him out of his office. It seems impossible for a man to get so excited on behalf of a practical strangor, if he was merely acting as a disinterested interpreter.

The particulars got up for the "Holstein"

case were fraudulent, it is evident from the evidence in the Admiralty action that the plaintiff did not get up these parti- -culars, but that some "street lawyer” did. Mr. Lei called no while he himself proper evidence to show who got up the case,

If the knows sufficient concerning the law courts to do so. Shaukiwan shopkeppers got a "street lawyer" other than Mr. Lei

to get up the case, what was the necessity of asking ur. Lei to introduce them to a good lawyer ↑

I am of opinion therefore that Mr. Lei Tak Yung was pecuniarily interested in the case, but there was no evidence to point as to how far his interest extended.

DIRI

JZ+N* HOA GIDOL

(sd.) c. Kel. Hascer,

Colonial Treasurer.

th. November,

1910.

VISJ91987 IsinaloD .nok

=0-0-0- (*=(~(~omonomonomcncm cm (•

.borotg otow (d) bus (a) aogrado

.(a) ogrado abıangt så

3h0T naat naød) acondźw avo a'gauỵ dat iod

begrainas víno har vAN?

‚noftasıp nåt 9893 aût 9totad daud Botata

aldot elf to eno od Botalot naw of tadd bro,#oMSAVE

Boy də” fad agushire a'mainblon .7% mort

aris to maentito ent mort denyistat don bib or ,namaedoqe *AW

toddar Jud aoldetorquatat oring ton aaw di al sade Tiksnisiq

mert erotiolfofont azotod ecao oft blei nau¥ daï tel .TM

odd new tod „Mi omao meithaq ont salt movi .ogbolword qvotronq

**gnt¬bioD .1M card woda of oocebiro on gaw aÐ SÍJ naraBodoqu rodorqrotal

Hon. Colonial Secretary,

Charges (a) and (b) were proved. As regards charge (e), I agree with the

minute of the Hon. Colonial Treasurer,

15th. November, 1910.

(sa.) . Chatham,

Director of Public Works.

Share This Page