CON

E euroiam

.{lomon aritumext to safzimmob eroted vitupal

BAR TOTUB807? Istnofob :Larens)=="250"922A

suspicion of being concerned with Cheu.

184

38 100

*axxo?” alduT to mojoetic

.0[el ,zadmavoff „d:SI yabtu.82

Ignøy fat fet

:81907 1197 TOYO #zarið ¤sed tool120 bad at drelo

argissio odd lla quob I .Jnowtolqne tremurievod reato on avad

•piqet to matteł w ni betst: anoeset odd Tot on tantana

.

(s) erano

-:(hoffso) lat of anoTM

lad word I .on17:0 stovionof Lažni††U ml Italð

I .00 entfof snoted opao alegnitas!! .*! To:moner I *300* **

oli .em od exoge of „ooftto wy at amit terld ta quy dat is! wat

dano awonti erad on lotanë qu božné malod si o6so s'use)* bias

? bladed at no ward of qui:tomoɑ vse vor nas gnof oa tot terito

run don aeob en ti bra sego agatdæay orís al bersonoo ai ngư

bodna 1 .bias od IIa ezw *3/T .*aiduot) odat ton Iliw I gæs

10 .8m Tawana don hib 9" „tava rt of aid thaw or ob vie mud

VI BAY #Siff: ■*ure:) of danqe or og sassiq"hlan of yah aman edit

od adora has frowt ...onim to holït enofa a bra atam foodse

.om blot of Jaiby od gatwo nado

-:bonimaKOWONG")

1odia azab quot to sauid Juoda ossiq Hood *I

•wo; not inoa bar nacode" .M farid wond toa ob I «JootIA TO%

anoted aridnom ow? 70 ano Joods - Cestra alumiḥ ototeď usw JI

Thodzus botnsw agitas mío) on [Is÷ com hib voy destra «ʼund)

bian agnidea: .17 .om [ad dog bib way

-on bian irov „tifmisla agnide dug binow ed qunom orir dom erf ti

Tot zo eenis aaw nottaavevano adr .maides .3 Juods gairt-

I .dtime story sit {{820qe ovж{ I bogrado 67ow now 15*18 #yab

tom bih vo% .on qiori of anaewa ori bas misi qled od zawor Joa ob

I .wo to bsojant drow a'nado galob tot om ddim +[ost halt

đom bib voy bĽA JEETLE nin oroteď naro dole boalb asmitomos

blora of L3 09 vado #elv to hɛotant woy do!w datab of em fap

nolotqane

Charge (c).

P. W. Goldring (called).

Solicitor. I remember the case Wong Chun Wan

7. S. S. "Holstein*Admiralty Action 4 of 1908. I was concerned for plaintiff. The case was introduced to me by Mr. Li Tak Yung, he brought the case to my office. My Managing Clerk Mr. D'Almada

took the instructions. I have seen him there on more than one

occasion. He was no party to the action his name does not appear in my books. There was a reference to the Registrar as to damages and we tried to settle. Deacon, Looker and Deacon offered $2,500 on behalf of S. S. *Holstein". Li Tak Yung came in when the negotiations were going on as regards a settlement. He was the spokeman. Te might have been the interpreter for the Shaukiwan people. We were instructed not to accept $2,500 and the enquiry before Registrar was proceeded with. We were furnish- -od with a list of clothing and jewellery. A copy of this was furnished to Deacon, Looker and Deacon. I put plaintiff in the witness box first on 2nd. day of Enquiry. The plaintiff said no jewellery and very little clothing had been in the ship and

he put in the list because he had been told to do so. After the enquiry Li Tak Yung came to my office with two shopkeepers of Shaukiwan he appeared to be greatly excited he talked so fast I could not understand what he said it appeared as if they

wished to quarrel with the plaintiff. Li Fak Yung came to my office I think three or four times in connection with this

matter.

Cross-examined:-

I generally saw you with my interpreter. I remebber saying I was concerned for plaintiff and I would pay

no money to anybody else.

(L1 Tak Yung says he was brought there as interpreter as the parties thought Mr. Goldring's interpreter could not be relied on as he was advising him not to pay to tho

shop

Share This Page