and
and nat
Za
for gratuities
allowances,
recommendationes
for overtime
not for
only
made
exceptinial
aire -
I believe
hind
would
H.K.
(2).
As to
Nat
7.
follows
should be
We hav laid down rude prat
despatch 39869
44013:
That
rule of be very salutary
This
or
in
Mess. Piency & Edwards it
We heard of the pachoval first in
40 135/09
which
fom the Sou2 endorsing
a
Special allowanc
should be
recommendation
one
6 Na
8
D. P. W.
Not
± 3
a
month
be granted
%
said
Good
made
each off. Nose
to payment having
thero
men.
Nothing
already
A be
Made
a
Tending
approve
A
Sin F. May
Mess
made
not
The point
WRA
را
refly
4 Picky
40135
to
no
been
approval.
The SAS did
but asha for
^
recommendation
Gratuity. In Sin F
mention
+ Edwards
taken up here.
Smie Then
Love
have heard nothing.
In Treasurer's
merely says.
minuta
I weld
accordingly Jay
Mess? Piercy
payments to
should
nt
вс
admitted
explanation of nat making engrinies
hat
Ne
197
• Edwards
without further
The SAS is
explain to Sir F.
on
The point.
Aud
Lame
should
Lugard
above
as
1
(2) and wchlls for
The wise.
made
uch to
ที่
Any payment
Feb 28"
and
(3). As regards
in Thuis
minute
explanation
which payment
Nov 30
was
Hamde
was
and (2) whether between
and, if so, why.
The payment to M.
Wright between
I Norih
at
Doclit
25th Oct and Nov 30 =
we must admit to clain,
Since the minites
Not
The
Le ceward
fixing
Bust
end 2
amonts
were taken
his gratuity.
I submit
to 27047
Distributed
aming
27047/10 show
had previously
be had
int.
Conson in
: Tell. A.D. allowingly The ref.
Kat
to
*No
amounts
Dhe staff during 1909
(which presumably include the payments
Now
Love
have
which
The
sqs.'s desp
does
not state
Nat Re
allowances
which
هما
been
to
drawn frion to its receipt.
were
to be
mis repre- affaris
refunded
This
it seems
to me.
true State
ร
Meas 5 Picicy
& [dwards)
docon't
constitute enough ground for approval
of have payments.
49/12.
- Bests
*C*
ATT