I
Me Collie hur. Com
J
see
that on 1455/95
wi
wold the Sor" of Hongkong that
provision
नৎ
was made for recognition
by Tasmania of Hongkong
but unless Tasmania Act
brau extended to akong
to akong by
a
Robates;
4 has '93
the issue
Procl under § 12, this is is
f quilt
not the case
A
madr
not
provision
wam
to recognise thong
Robates but to late power
to Ncognise
бесебеб
them if
Maio trans it
to 50 back p thi
later
So
H
1/12
a.1.4/1/12
was decided
used t
4862
A Wi jusiest and
AVC
No I think
Atomic
WBZ ~5/12
save it.
we may
No.
.336
Hongkong.
My Lord,
CO
34443
PEOP
126
Men o NOV 10
Government House,
Hongkong, 8th. October, 1910.
With reference to Mr. Chamberlain's
You 14021:00 Despatch No. 149 of the 24th. May, 1900, I have the honour
50:95/6
to forward the enclosed copy of a letter from Messrs.
Deacon, Looker and Deacon dated the 29th. ultimo, and to
inform Your Lordship that no Order-in-Council has been
made in Hongkong with respect to the State of Victoria
(Australia) and that I am not aware whether that State
has made adequate provision for the recognition of pro-
-bates and administrations granted by the Hongkong Courts.
The State had apparently not done so in 1900.
2.
I take this opportunity of
enquiring whether any Colonies other than those mentioned
in Mr. Chamberlain's Despatch, above referred to, and in
his Despatch No. 38 of the 21st. February, 1896, have now
made provision for recognizing such probates and
(21.442). W1.32,696-3. 6000. 2/10. A.&E.W. (26,162).
:
9068-28. G000. 6/10
THE RIGHT HONOURABLE
THE EARL OF CREWE,
8cc...
&C + 1
administrations.