apreements is accepted,
kemp's
the fact that by Kemp is not a solicitor will be y much has importance.
I was be inclined to take by Kemp.
+ to get
an Most Co. Al from the S.. wit
2 Subject to 74 Risley's shone
? proceed an
Whelegram
M.
fur. Collins
may
We
A&c
proposed if oth.
JR1
have
inla
your
bas
The It. Kone, chamse Extradition Ate 1889
on the lung beich Extradition Aut
1870.
is based
and when the
practice to not provided by the chactment it wo at any rate breexpedient to assimilt it as
amey
m
far as horsill to the practice Here, teline's the Crown manages +
the U.K. wundertakes
to Mari
past
all the legal proceeding necessary fregitio cominaté extradition
مان
of its duty under the particules Extradition Tualy.
(21.442), Wt.32,696--3. 6000, 2/10. A.&E.W.
0058-28. 6000. 6/10.
(20,462).
I have never heard of
121
an
extradition case
hem
brine "run" by the foreign stati concerned, and
I do not think that are such stati w? consider
it
to attempt to do so here
certainder where the fueritin applies for
Lam
unt
of
Hakes Corpus the have offers of the town alwage (I think) appear to show cause against a zak.
But perhaps you might consult the H_0
so extradition is of
Mr. Fiddes
course trici palives. J.J.A
14/9
In view of Mr. Risley's minute I don't think
it necessary to refer to the H.0. Towstec
I would much prefer
that these cases should be conducted by the Crown
Solicitor - fees received from the Chinese Govt.
Father
than
to be paid into the Treas. be the solution favour-
ed by the 0.A.G., that the Chinese Govt. should
employ private Solicitors, to be approved by the
Col. Govt. Disapproval would place the Govt. in an
awkward position ).
This being so, I think we should have a Crown
Solicitor and an Asst. Crown Sol. For the first
post I would take Mr. Kemp, on the salary proposed.
We don't want Mr. Bowley in the Govt. service, and
to offer special terms to get him is an unnecessary
extravagance for an undesirable end.
For the second post, 1.would appoint from home,