whon oath, to permesh them for contempt, and to
regwortion any wasome, pobci assistance of
order lade
use to accepted.
But unless there is some proven in the law
the
萎
in the law of It Wong
(alesih I cannot find/ defining the powers of perso authorized to "hold a judicial inequing", I think
that these honics wh? by indicated wi
I suecast for conson that in this case
the ad
for the words
"hold a judicial inquing" which subapitulid
"hold an inquiry," ; and that there she is added
i
at the end of the proviso something to the
A
"For the parpones of more follorome, affect A such inquiry th
bedcmnt to the Said officers shall have all the howers of Consensormers appointed the under the
Commersionen Powers romana 1886"-
An alternation we be to beans "hold a judicial
me lume;" and to add
that the officers
C
proven to the effect
oh ban the houscon of Magistration under the the potentis ade 1890 and that the
h
poloceediness at the inguing shed to grouted so far as possible by the provaes of that ade.
The: macy furbaks to prefered
}
as it prescrous
the fudicial chassiter of the inquiry. the areas wider the 1888 order are not
strictly of a judicial character"}
for Cox
Puttiene alkmativos
that the OAI chose
га
15/17
A really inhleigunt MAS. it have schmitted a draft g the proposed
new lover.
often tur.
As it is
wi. shall have to han fuilter östle to amend this amending offre
a
or else upeat the whole ore 20-seat it for
the sccond time
TES 17.
No.
197
Hongkong.
Thrafer
した
My Lord,
alternative
khong long.
CO 21071
RECR
Rre II JUL 10
Government House
8th. June, 1910.
Referring to Your Lordship's
Despatch No. 336 of the 31st. of last December,
I have
26
the honour to submit for the signification of His Majesty's
pleasure the following Ordinance entitled:-
An Ordinance to amend the Malicious Damage
Ordinance, 1865. (No. 10 of 1910.)
Cenclosure
Enclosure
x and persons tippl
the Cominican har
no right
of define.
Put these. alternatives meantime des Sanction,
Amme
NDL
7677
2.
The customary report by the
Attorney-General is annexed.
3.
I do not consider that the
Supreme Court is a suitable tribunal for the investigation
of cases under Part II of the Ordinance. Indeed as far as
the New Territories are concerned it would be impracticable
to refer them to such tribunal. The procedure indicated in
Section 5 has, therefore, been substituted and under it the
safeguard that Your Lordship wishes imposed will I think
THE RIGHT HONOURABLE
THE EARL OF CREWE,
Scc...
&C. >
800.
be