!
and hoon omitud
Agree to puthiation on there toons
I do not ser
lof
antial ay macful
purpal will b. seiro 3 publication;
which
$ m
were waste of no scientific person will care button about her clemente's vours &
likely to take
money
adbody else is
in the mems:
Sie &. Hopwood
inkerat
ar
strongly
tavros, so dis 3. Lugard puts so straugh
9
procard as proposed.
yu - if Col. Jesty
Loid Crows will approve. Bas I
Now that the them sets has
loved down his last par.
K
particuler dijection &
AVC
think the bch. Os
mint
M
her. Browne,
pafés might also be mmitted. We don't wast to five rise to
apprehen sie that we are
Soning to put down
!
tobacco sundang,
the Japanes view of the k ideas as t relative hare
It would b lamusing to to t
pothication? and the Pecos minute highte
Shaund
it is aband there?
I do not thewill much will have to acco
Ha
he US former mach of Legislative (coil if the wither.
published
4
table pium, The
be the me Whal
€ 14.11.
Jett 13.6. I agre
are to recar pomal code
OFFIC
Lord Grewe
I have been thinking
282
over this, and have come to the conclusion that we might get into we end of
trouble if we allow this document to be published
and laid
wo a
the table
of the Hong Kong Council fovernment paper. Also, apart from the trouble certain to be caused over here, I think it
would be
wrong.
No doubt one could get an anglyst to make
that the chemical constituents
Experiments shewing
of tea are such that the physiological changes
Produced in the human body
Cruises
J
violence than al-
conduce more to-
Equal quantity
of gin. But if we laid such a document here, without any of the rebutting evidence, there would be protests. But this is a much stronger case, because (a) the volume of medical testimony
to the contrary effect is that opisin Smoking is far harmful than tobacco smoking is overwhelming, but none of it has been putliched
tu pro