231
se encl.3 to
esp.93 of 15/5/
12275/99.
158 of Eastern
see p.162 of astern 66
40601/02
ee minutes on
0601/0
latitude
thus:-
22° 9' N. But I think it can be explained
The Gov: rnor issued a proclamation in April 1899* defining the boundaries in which he stated:-
"The western boundary is 113 52 E. Long.
"The Southern boundary is 22° 9' N. Latitude"
The
The despatch was acknowledged but no notice was taken of
this proclamation or of its terms which of course are
not in accordance with the convention map. The local
people followed this proclamation in marking the position of meridian 1133 etc. and Major General
Gascoigne repeated it again in his map accompanying
his despatch confidential of 27th August 1902. discrepancy between this map and the War Office map .D.1393 passed unnoticed in the Colonial Office. Colony had I.D.1393 at the time. I may add that General Gascoigne's map does not show Tai A Chal at all. The I.D.map shows it but also shows that its S.W.tbp is North of 22° 9' N.Latitude; it therefore makes another
alteration of the boundary as shown in the convention map which has passed quite unnoticed.
The
Still as the line
runs from the S.W.tip of Lantao through the S.W.tup of Tai A Chat to the Latitude 22° 9' N. it carries out
the intention of the convention map.
14.
I now come to the other points raised by
29166/01
conf.desp.of
15/7/01 par.2.
Sir F.Lugard.
(1)
The position of the three islands.
Sir H.Blake pointed out that they are to the East
.D.1393,
of meridian 1130 521 E. according to map I.D.13
and therefore within British waters.
Mr Chamberlain
replied